Trump 47

Swan to Leavitt: "The president has long said that it would be an abuse of power for a president to direct prosecutors to investigate him. Last week, President Trump explicitly directed the DOJ to scrutinize Chris Krebs ... how is that not an abuse of power?" (Note that Leavitt has no response.)

 
Exclusive: One of US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's top advisors, Dan Caldwell, was escorted out of the Pentagon on Tuesday after being identified during an investigation into leaks at the Department of Defense, an official told Reuters https://reut.rs/44qHRmN
 
Gee they didn't need to be bailed out before you became POTUS...I wonder WHAT did Biden do to make u have to say this !!??!!??!?

1000004495.png
 

'Rein in this dictator': Red state constituents confront GOP senator at tense town hall​

Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) was met by a group of frustrated constituents who peppered him with questions about his deference to President Donald Trump during a packed town hall meeting.

CNN reported that Grassley fielded questions on a number of topics including tariffs, Medicaid funding and deportations during a Tuesday town hall in Fort Madison, Iowa. One constituent in particular prompted the audience to applaud when he confronted the Iowa Republican over Trump's treatment of Maryland father Kilmar Abrego Garcia, who was sent to an El Salvadoran prison last month without a court hearing.


"We would like to know what you as the people, the Congress who are supposed to rein in this dictator, what are you going to do about these people have been sentenced to life imprisonment in a foreign country with no due process?" The man asked. "Our government. cannot do anything?"


CNN host Boris Sanchez asked reporter Steve Contorno – who was at the town hall — about the tone of the meeting. Contorno said that while there was "a lot of appreciation" for Grassley to face his constituents, there was still "considerable and palpable angst" toward Iowa's senior U.S. senator over constituents' perception that he wasn't doing enough to oppose the Trump administration's more controversial policies. One woman suggested Trump's treatment of immigrants fleeing violence was un-Christian.


"I believe very strongly in my Christian faith. I preach on Sundays, and I believe very strongly that we welcome the stranger," the constituent said. "I think turning away people who have come here for asylum is one of the most shameful things we are doing right now."

Another constituent asked Grassley of Abrego Garcia: "Are you gonna bring that guy back?"

Grassley responded: "That's not a power of Congress." The constituent then yelled: "The Supreme Court said to bring him back!" The Iowa senator then said "the president of [El Salvador] is not subject to our U.S. Supreme Court, prompting the audience to boo.
 
Jessica Tarlov: “60 Minutes found that 75% of the people who have been sent to that prison do not have a criminal record here.”

Jeanine Pirro: “60 Minutes went over and interviewed them?”

Tarlov: “Yeah, they actually spoke to the lawyers involved in these cases.”

 
Admit you incorrectly deported the man, then claim you can't get him back, then bash his parenting skill??!!??

What in the evil fu#&ery is this

Leavitt defends deportation plans by mocking the media, saying Garcia was "hiding in Maryland" and sarcastically calling him a "candidate for father of the year."

Ah yes, the compassionate conservatism we’ve heard so much about.

 
Steve Bannon: We're working on 5 or 6 different alternatives that Trump could run again, and I think 4 or 5 of them are going to work

Don't count your chickens before they are hatched. In 2020, Trump, even though he was the incumbent, couldn't beat a feeble old geezer named Biden.
 

...
"No government - regardless of which party is in power - should dictate what private universities can teach," Harvard's president Alan Garber said in a letter posted on the university's website.

Not long after Harvard refused to agree to the White House's sweeping list of demands - which included directions on how to govern, hire and teach - the Trump administration froze $2.2bn (£1.7bn) of federal funds to the institution.

Many students and alumni lauded the university's decision to stand its ground, despite the consequences. Former President Barack Obama, an alumnus himself, called Trump's move "ham-handed" and praised Harvard as "an example for other higher-ed institutions".
...
Trump's attacks on Harvard are not isolated - the government's antisemitism task force has identified at least 60 universities for review.

Nor did the latest move come out of the blue. Trump and his Vice-President JD Vance have long railed against higher education institutions. In 2021, Vance gave a speech that described universities as the "enemy".
...
Harvard student Sa'maia Evans, who is an activist and member of the university's African and African American Resistance Organization, said the university's decision to take a stand was a long time coming.

"Harvard will only do that of which it is held accountable to," she told the BBC. She pointed to campus protests in the past few weeks - and the widespread criticism of Columbia's agreement with the Trump administration - as helping to put pressure on university officials.

"They know the public - they would experience public backlash" if they capitulated, Ms Evans said.

"It would be atypical (for) Harvard to do anything outside of what would be in its own interest."
...
In his latest comments on the university, early on Wednesday, Trump attacked the "radical left" Harvard leadership and said the institution could "no longer be considered even a decent place of learning".
...
"There's more the government can do if it wants to attack Harvard, and I'm not optimistic that it's going to stop after cutting $2.2 billion," Matthew Tobin, the academic representative on Harvard's student council.

Mr Tobin said the idea that the Trump administration was making these demands to help Harvard is "malarkey".

"Its a total bad-faith attack," he told the BBC. "The funding cuts have to do with Trump attacking an institution that he views as liberal, and wanting to exercise more control over what people teach and how students learn and think."
 

...
"No government - regardless of which party is in power - should dictate what private universities can teach," Harvard's president Alan Garber said in a letter posted on the university's website.

Not long after Harvard refused to agree to the White House's sweeping list of demands - which included directions on how to govern, hire and teach - the Trump administration froze $2.2bn (£1.7bn) of federal funds to the institution.

Many students and alumni lauded the university's decision to stand its ground, despite the consequences. Former President Barack Obama, an alumnus himself, called Trump's move "ham-handed" and praised Harvard as "an example for other higher-ed institutions".
...
Trump's attacks on Harvard are not isolated - the government's antisemitism task force has identified at least 60 universities for review.

Nor did the latest move come out of the blue. Trump and his Vice-President JD Vance have long railed against higher education institutions. In 2021, Vance gave a speech that described universities as the "enemy".
...
Harvard student Sa'maia Evans, who is an activist and member of the university's African and African American Resistance Organization, said the university's decision to take a stand was a long time coming.

"Harvard will only do that of which it is held accountable to," she told the BBC. She pointed to campus protests in the past few weeks - and the widespread criticism of Columbia's agreement with the Trump administration - as helping to put pressure on university officials.

"They know the public - they would experience public backlash" if they capitulated, Ms Evans said.

"It would be atypical (for) Harvard to do anything outside of what would be in its own interest."
...
In his latest comments on the university, early on Wednesday, Trump attacked the "radical left" Harvard leadership and said the institution could "no longer be considered even a decent place of learning".
...
"There's more the government can do if it wants to attack Harvard, and I'm not optimistic that it's going to stop after cutting $2.2 billion," Matthew Tobin, the academic representative on Harvard's student council.

Mr Tobin said the idea that the Trump administration was making these demands to help Harvard is "malarkey".

"It’s a total bad-faith attack," he told the BBC. "The funding cuts have to do with Trump attacking an institution that he views as liberal, and wanting to exercise more control over what people teach and how students learn and think."
I see this as a win-win.
* Harvard wins: As a private institution (with a near $60B endowment), they are free to continue executing the policies they believe are best for the university. They are not being forced to make changes, but if they want to continue receiving public taxpayer funds they need to implement the directive.
* General Public: Although there are absolutely benefits that are derived from these funds, an uneven amount goes to private vs public universities. Total taxpayer funds can either be lowered or re-routed to public universities (ie OSU and OU receive significantly less than this).
 
Back
Top