Trump 47

I saw the work by Olga Lautman and her findings were disturbing: Steven Witkoff was in Russia when he was added to the signal chat. Russia has infiltrated Signal and used it against Ukrainians. Very possible they have the classified signal info:

 
Jen Psaki opened her show tonight with a 20-minute piece and interview with Atlantic editor Jeffrey Goldberg: "What happened at the beginning of this chain is the cabinet members were asked about their point of contact. John Ratcliffe gave the whole real name of his liason, an active CIA officer, never named before in public."

 
Greenland did not invite an American delegation to come visit this week, the self-ruling island’s government said Monday, flatly denying a claim made by President Donald Trump.

 
Jan 6 folks get a full pardon for Jan 6 and the. That pardon is expanded to cover OTHER crimes committed by different points in their life, but they showed up for Trump on Jan 6th so EVERYTHING is forgiven


Vandalize a Tesla........ DEATH SENTENCE

complete authoritarian hypocrisy and BS

Fox News host Harris Faulkner came up with a wild hypothetical situation in which vandals who attack Teslas could face the death penalty, and Trump Press Sec. Karoline Leavitt agrees

 

Michael Waltz 'learned his lesson' - but which one?


8025c513-814f-4824-a231-6907106001a4.jpg.webp
Anthony Zurcher
North America correspondent

U.S. National Security Advisor Mike Waltz looks on as he sits next to U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, while U.S. President Donald Trump

Trump said his national security adviser Mike Waltz (pictured) was a good man who had learned his lesson
It's not a scandal, it's a "glitch". And "not a serious one" at that.

At least, this is how Donald Trump is labelling the mistakes that led to a prominent journalist being included in a high-level administration group chat about recent US strikes on Houthi forces in Yemen.

The president's comments to NBC News arrived after hours of speculation and uncertainty over how he would react to what appears to be a stunning breach of operational security – and a possible violation of federal law.

Was he fuming? Was he weighing whom to hold accountable? Was he preparing to lash out at perceived enemies?

No, no and no. That is, at least if Trump’s first public comments are any indication. He emphasised that the Houthi strikes were successful – which has become the White House's main response to concerns over the seriousness of the security breach. And he stood by his embattled national security adviser, who seems to have inadvertently invited the journalist into the chat.

"Michael Waltz has learned a lesson," Trump said, "and he's a good man."

Exactly what that "lesson" may be is unclear.

Don't invite journalists to government group chats? Don't conduct such conversations on commercial messaging apps? Don't risk violating federal laws governing recordkeeping and the handling of sensitive national security data?

In the days ahead, reporters and political adversaries are going to want more detailed answers from the president, even if at the moment he appears to believe the controversy will eventually blow over.
 

Michael Waltz 'learned his lesson' - but which one?​


8025c513-814f-4824-a231-6907106001a4.jpg.webp
Anthony Zurcher
North America correspondent

U.S. National Security Advisor Mike Waltz looks on as he sits next to U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, while U.S. President Donald Trump

Trump said his national security adviser Mike Waltz (pictured) was a good man who had learned his lesson
It's not a scandal, it's a "glitch". And "not a serious one" at that.

At least, this is how Donald Trump is labelling the mistakes that led to a prominent journalist being included in a high-level administration group chat about recent US strikes on Houthi forces in Yemen.

The president's comments to NBC News arrived after hours of speculation and uncertainty over how he would react to what appears to be a stunning breach of operational security – and a possible violation of federal law.

Was he fuming? Was he weighing whom to hold accountable? Was he preparing to lash out at perceived enemies?

No, no and no. That is, at least if Trump’s first public comments are any indication. He emphasised that the Houthi strikes were successful – which has become the White House's main response to concerns over the seriousness of the security breach. And he stood by his embattled national security adviser, who seems to have inadvertently invited the journalist into the chat.

"Michael Waltz has learned a lesson," Trump said, "and he's a good man."

Exactly what that "lesson" may be is unclear.

Don't invite journalists to government group chats? Don't conduct such conversations on commercial messaging apps? Don't risk violating federal laws governing recordkeeping and the handling of sensitive national security data?

In the days ahead, reporters and political adversaries are going to want more detailed answers from the president, even if at the moment he appears to believe the controversy will eventually blow over.
Of course Trump thinks it will blow over. What hasn't just blown over for him? There's never been consequences for anything for him since the day he started his run in 2015.

And it's not like he cares about protecting classified information. He did keep boxes of materials in his bathroom to show guests.
 
Last edited:
Reporter: “Can you share how your information about war plans was shared with a journalist?”

Hegseth: “So you are talking about a — deceitful and highly discredited so-called journalist who has made a profession of peddling hoaxes…”


Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, in an extraordinary breach of U.S. national security intelligence, disclosed war plans in a group chat that included the top editor of The Atlantic two hours before U.S. troops launched attacks against the Houthi militia in Yemen, the White House said

So, in that case, why were you stupid enough to share your plans with that reporter so poorly thought of? This might as well be a scene from the movie Idiocracy.
 
REED: Were you overseas during any part of these discussions?

GABBARD: Yes I was

REED: Were you using your private phone or public phone for Signal?

GABBARD: I won't speak to this because it's under review

REED: What is under review? It's a very simple question

 
Sen. Warner: If this group chat had gotten out, American lives could have been lost. Did you participate in the group chat, Director Gabbard?

DNI Gabbard: I do not want to get into specifics

Warner: Director Ratcliffe?

Dir. of CIA Ratcliffe: I was

 
Shut the courts down do they can no longer rule against you

JUST NOW: House Speaker Mike Johnson says they are considering defunding and eliminating entire district courts who issue rulings against them

 
Last edited:
Moskowitz: Rather than giving a long speech, I feel like I can just use this. So, that’s a fist, an American flag, fire. From now on, when we do things where we agree, I will just hold this up.

Raskin: Would you explain the reference?

Moskowitz: So this is like when we’re in a chat with friends about where we are dropping missiles

Massie: I think you’re supposed to have the flexed arm instead of the fist

Moskowitz: What signal chat are you in?

 
BENNET: Don't insult the intelligence of the American people. Did Goldberg invite himself to the Signal thread?

RATCLIFFE: I don't know how he was invited. I've seen conflicting reports.

BENNET: You're the CIA director! Why didn't you call out that he was present on the thread? ... this is just a normal day at the CIA

 
Dan Crenshaw dismisses Hegseth texting war plans to a Signal group that included a journalist: "We gotta move on. If Secretary Hegseth says there was no classified information, I'll take him at his word."

 
Shit the courts down do they can no longer rule against you

JUST NOW: House Speaker Mike Johnson says they are considering defunding and eliminating entire district courts who issue rulings against them


captain america marvel GIF
 
Back
Top