Philosophy & Religion Thread

I find Bell to be an easy read. He lays things out well and is very conversational. Almost stream of consciousness. His book “How To Read The Bible” is similar. The audiobooks are great as well.
I've run across that one. Another good one that has influenced me much is "How to read the Bible for all it's worth" by Gordon Fee and Douglas Stuart. My literary approach to scripture is heavily influenced by them.
 
Psalms 23
A PSALM OF DAVID.
1 The LORD is my shepherd; I shall not want.
2 He makes me lie down in green pastures.
He leads me beside still waters.
3 He restores my soul.
He leads me in paths of righteousness
for his name’s sake.
4 Even though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death,
I will fear no evil,
for you are with me;
your rod and your staff,
they comfort me.
5 You prepare a table before me
in the presence of my enemies;
you anoint my head with oil;
my cup overflows.
6 Surely goodness and mercy shall follow me
all the days of my life,
and I shall dwell in the house of the LORD
forever.

Your rod and your staff, they comfort me. This was the topic of tonight's mini-sermon in our recovery group at church. The lesson afterwards was on "God's discipline". The problem with all of it is people conflate discipline and punishment. They are not the same thing. The pastor talked about how the staff provided guidance when a sheep would wander astray and bring the sheep back into the fold. Good. But then he talked about the protection provided by the rod. When a sheep wandered a little farther the rod might have to be applied and cause a little pain to get the sheep back into line. Oh no. That is not at all what the rod represents in the psalm. It represents protection alright. From predators. It is used.... against wolves. Not against the sheep. A shepherd, a good shepherd would understand that.

Discipline is routines and practices intended to produce good behavior. Think of practicing sports or music or anything that it takes great discipline to get good at. Punishment is retribution for bad behavior. Tackling drills are discipline. Prison is punishment. Spanking is not discipline, it is punishment.

I've heard this illustration from the pulpit before:
A young lamb kept wandering off. It is well-known in Christian circles that before the shepherd placed the lamb on his shoulders, he broke its leg, so it could not run away again. By the time the leg has healed the lamb has learned to stay near the shepherd. This was common practice in Jesus’ day, and so is implied in this and other shepherding texts. Because the shepherd uses this cruel-to-be-kind tactic, we can expect that there will be times when Jesus, our Good Shepherd, will do the same to us. And we, as shepherds of our children, will need to use corporal punishment to teach them not to stray.​
There may be consequences to our behavior. But God does not purposefully hurt us "for our own good." After hearing this I actually emailed the editor of an academic journal dedicated to sheep and asked her if it could be true and she said that most likely the lamb would die and that it couldn't possibly be true. She also told me an interesting story that her sheep know the pitch of her truck engine and will gather to be fed when they hear her truck coming. "My sheep know my voice." They won't gather for the pitch of another truck engine, just hers. "My sheep know my voice."

Matthew 28:19-20
Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, 20 teaching them to observe all that I have commanded you.

Substitute the word "punish" for "make disciples of" and it really turns the Great Commandment on its head, "Go therefore and punish all nations". Why would anyone want to be a disciple if it meant punishment? Self-discipline and self-punishment would mean the same thing, and they are very, very different.

In the Book of Job, Job's friends tried multiple times to convince Job that what was happening to him was because of sin in his life, that it was retribution for something he had done. But God had declared at the beginning of the book that Job was righteous man. This does not mean that Job was sinless, of course he wasn't. It means that when Job sinned he dealt with it righteously. God said to Job's friends, "You have not said of me what is right." The book of Job is a specific refutation of retribution theology, also known as tit for tat.

Hebrews 12:7-11
7 It is for discipline that you have to endure. God is treating you as sons. For what son is there whom his father does not discipline? 8 If you are left without discipline, in which all have participated, then you are illegitimate children and not sons. 9 Besides this, we have had earthly fathers who disciplined us and we respected them. Shall we not much more be subject to the Father of spirits and live? 10 For they disciplined us for a short time as it seemed best to them, but he disciplines us for our good, that we may share his holiness. 11 For the moment all discipline seems painful rather than pleasant, but later it yields the peaceful fruit of righteousness to those who have been trained by it.

The Greek word translated "discipline" is παιδεία paideia, or education and training. Again, it means routines and practices intended to bring about good behavior. Not punishment. God does not punish us to bring about good behavior.

1 John 4:8 God is love.
 
How do I know that the rod in Psalm 23 is for protection against predators? Because David has a testimony:

1 Samuel 17:34-36
(NASB) But David said to Saul, “Your servant was tending his father’s sheep. When a lion or a bear came and took a lamb from the flock, 35 I went out after him and attacked him, and rescued it from his mouth; and when he rose up against me, I seized him by his beard and struck him and killed him. 36 Your servant has killed both the lion and the bear; and this uncircumcised Philistine will be like one of them, since he has taunted the armies of the living God.”
 
My parents graduated from a Nazarene college, but tended to bounce around from denomination to denomination, always staying on the evangelical/fundamentalist spectrum. Growing up, we were baptist (I cannot recall the denomination), Presbyterian (PCA), bible church, Lutheran (Missouri Synod), and various evangelical churches, some of which were unaffiliated or non-denominational. My parents were significant proponents of Focus on the Family’s teachings and ideology, and routinely utilized those “parenting” techniques in our home. I was also homeschooled until 7th grade.

I had faith as much as I knew what it was until late high school and early college when I began asking questions that sunday school teachers could not address, and became a militant atheist. After a really rough patch late in college, I returned to the faith due to existential angst, and remember thinking that even though I didn’t really believe it, I had to just “buy into the BS” to get through that difficult time. Despite that mindset it actually worked, and over time, I forgot about that whole rationalization. At least for awhile.

As an adult, I attended a couple non-denominational evangelical churches and an Assemblies of God church. I became more passionate over time decided to do a career change and become a Theology professor. So I decided to get my Masters from evangelical seminary as the first step before later getting a PhD, which was a good experience despite me non “using” the degree after I graduated. The areas that resonated with me were:

Contemplative Spirituality/Christian Mysticism. The Cloud of Unknowing and the writings and teachings of Julian of Norwich (she was illiterate, so other people who had talked to her wrote them), Meister Eckhart, Thomas Merton all resonated with me and still made a lasting impact. I realized from reading Huston Smith, a professor of religion who actually lived out and practiced multiple contemplative religions over his lifetime that the contemplative branches of the various religions had more in common with one another than their parent faiths. I didn’t take is word on this and started reading Sufi (Islam), Advaita Vedanta (Hindu), and some mahayana (Buddhist) works, while dabbling practicing the latter. He was right: the contemplative paths all fit together--they are the same path. For those interested, Smith’s idea actually came from Adolous Huxley in his book The Perennial Philosophy, which is a great read.

Process Theology/Panentheism. Process theology did not view God as possessing the 3 O’s (omniscience, omnipotence and omnipresence), but defined by an unlimited potentiality. Something constantly growing, learning and morphing.

Liberation Theology. It is uncanny how much of the old testament resonates with Gustavo Gutierrez’ readings and the plight of marginalized peoples. In highly religious societies, it is one of the few ways to break up the ruling classes hegemony and mistreatment of common people. It is probably one of the more useful/pragmatic approaches to theology today.

That being said, as I kept at my studies, more and more gaps kept chipping away my faith. First, the discrepancies in the gospel accounts, then the number and nature of the New Testament pseudographs. Then the textual/codex issues, and the political nature of the Council of Nicea, stripping canon away from some texts and adding it to others, in some cases less likely to be authentic. The fantastical claims of creation, worldwide floods, plagues, prophecies, divine approval/disapproval, satan, virgin births, resurrections all powerful gods have no basis or evidence in reality. They weren’t even unique to Christianity/Judaism and in many cases were borrowed from other contemporary religions. I came to the realization that it is highly unlikely that any of it was true. It had humanity’s fingerprints all over it. Who made who?

So then I looked for other reasons to keep the faith. I knew of “Christian atheists” and priests who kept the trappings of religion because they believed it helped more than it hurt thought “well at least the lessons it imparted and the morality that it taught was good”; so it overall it helped people lived moral lives. But far too many examples ran counter to this, whether it was on genocide, sexuality, treatment of other groups, the treatment of women, slavery, the idea that God even has a “chosen people”, how authority should be treated and I realized that it was conflicted at best and actually was a source of suffering and ignorance at worst, so I left the church and the faith shortly after I graduated from seminary.

I think we have little to gain from studying the bible outside of an anthropological approach. Religion is a heuristic that has outlived its utility, something that provided an evolutionary advantage to humans in a previous era, but is a hindrance now. Only certain portions of the gospels have useful moral teachings and it is still mixed with magical thinking and dualism. The majority of people alive today are more moral than the ancients, almost down to a person. For everything that is covered in the text, there is a better source for those things elsewhere. We know so much more than the ancients and our knowledge of how morality works is so much more sophisticated than theirs. We have had 2000+ more years of cause and effect to observe, how could we not have more insight than them into morality, ethics and the nature of things? Again this goes back to epistemology. Does knowledge come down from the heavens, or is it up to us to go out and discover it for ourselves? I think we have to be a light onto our own path. No one else can do it for us.

Since then, I have been a nontheist and have practiced secular buddhism, as most sects in buddhism function not as a religion (although they have the trappings and ritual of a religion), but as a philosophy. A way of living and approaching life. There is no litmus test for belief, no creed to cling to. Some that I sit with still practice Christianity or Judaism. Some believe in reincarnation, while others like myself do not. But there still is one constant, and that is of a continual opening to the nature of reality, whatever it happens to be.

@TheMonkey I read a Richard Rohr book awhile back at it was pretty good. Have you read this one?
I am dying to know what your dissertation was on and where you studied.
 
My dad was a pastor of a small-town Word of Faith church for 20 years. He has the biggest heart of anyone I know and was an amazingly caring ‘shepherd’.

One member didn’t like how he was spending money on updating the church and constructing a new building. They started spreading rumors and the church was headed for a schism. My father cared more about the church community than his own job, so he proposed that he would stay on a short time until the church was out of debt and had selected a new pastor. That’s what happened.

My father moved on without any bitterness, but we all knew how much this hurt him. He had come in and rescued this church from the brink of failure. He had poured his heart into caring for these people. In the end, many of them rejected him and were frankly hateful.

I hope this doesn’t happen to either of you. But the church is people. People are flawed. That is why they need this type of leader. It is also why they hurt and reject compassionate and visionary leadership—biting the hand that feeds them.
 
My dad was a pastor of a small-town Word of Faith church for 20 years. He has the biggest heart of anyone I know and was an amazingly caring ‘shepherd’.

One member didn’t like how he was spending money on updating the church and constructing a new building. They started spreading rumors and the church was headed for a schism. My father cared more about the church community than his own job, so he proposed that he would stay on a short time until the church was out of debt and had selected a new pastor. That’s what happened.

My father moved on without any bitterness, but we all knew how much this hurt him. He had come in and rescued this church from the brink of failure. He had poured his heart into caring for these people. In the end, many of them rejected him and were frankly hateful.

I hope this doesn’t happen to either of you. But the church is people. People are flawed. That is why they need this type of leader. It is also why they hurt and reject compassionate and visionary leadership—biting the hand that feeds them.
Yeah, no, people suck. Love them perfectly and they hang you on a cross. But still love them.
 
My dad was a pastor of a small-town Word of Faith church for 20 years. He has the biggest heart of anyone I know and was an amazingly caring ‘shepherd’.

One member didn’t like how he was spending money on updating the church and constructing a new building. They started spreading rumors and the church was headed for a schism. My father cared more about the church community than his own job, so he proposed that he would stay on a short time until the church was out of debt and had selected a new pastor. That’s what happened.

My father moved on without any bitterness, but we all knew how much this hurt him. He had come in and rescued this church from the brink of failure. He had poured his heart into caring for these people. In the end, many of them rejected him and were frankly hateful.

I hope this doesn’t happen to either of you. But the church is people. People are flawed. That is why they need this type of leader. It is also why they hurt and reject compassionate and visionary leadership—biting the hand that feeds them.
Something similar has already happened, and we all are coming to the end of the saga, Lord willing. But God has been incredibly kind to reveal my shortcomings and sin through it all. I have come to love the calling of being an under-shepherd more and thus the folks Jesus shed his blood for. Even when they bite.
 
Multiple US officials as Whistleblowers have confirmed the existence of Aliens and UFO's publicly for the first time ever in the last few years

1. David Grusch

Former U.S. Air Force intelligence officer and representative to the Pentagon’s Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP) Task Force.
Key Claims:

  • Alleged the U.S. government has retrieved several “non‑human origin technical vehicles”, some containing “dead pilots.” [stripes.com]
  • Testified under oath that the U.S. has run a multi‑decade crash retrieval and reverse‑engineering program. [newsnationnow.com]
  • Claimed individuals with direct knowledge told him about non‑human craft and biological remains.

2. Ryan Graves

Former U.S. Navy pilot and Executive Director of Americans for Safe Aerospace.
Key Claims:

  • Testified that U.S. sensor and video data would change the national conversation if the public could see it.
  • Did not allege extraterrestrial craft directly, but supported claims that UAP encounters demonstrate extraordinary, unexplained technology.
    [stripes.com]

3. David Fravor

Former U.S. Navy Commanding Officer, known for the 2004 USS Nimitz “Tic Tac” encounter.
Key Claims:

  • Testified about personal encounters with UAP showcasing flight characteristics beyond known U.S. capabilities.
  • Did not explicitly claim extraterrestrial craft but provided testimony backing the idea that some UAP may not be human-made.
    [newsnationnow.com]

4. Tim Gallaudet

Retired Navy Rear Admiral and former oceanography commander.
Key Claims:

  • Testified about encountering UAP showing “flight and structural characteristics unlike anything in our arsenal.”
  • Stated such encounters occurred in operational Navy training environments.
    [newsweek.com]

5. Michael Gold

Former NASA official.
Key Claims:

  • Testified that secrecy surrounding UAPs is obstructing scientific progress.
  • Suggested non‑human technology may be involved but did not claim first‑hand knowledge.
    [nbcnews.com]

6. Luis Elizondo

Former Pentagon official who once directed the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP).
Key Claims:

  • Asserted in congressional testimony that “UAP are real” and interacting with humanity.
  • Implied advanced intelligence may be involved but did not explicitly claim recovered alien craft.
    [yahoo.com]

Obama said it just last week that statistically it is almost impossible that Aliens don't inhabit other planets but said we have not had any contact yet

Then TODAY we have this story

Congressman says there is a stranded UFO in a country outside of the US that is so big 'there's a building built around it'​


A US congressman claims a foreign nation is in possession of a crashed alien spacecraft so massive that authorities have had to construct an "entire building around it".

Missouri congressman Eric Burlison says he has heard reports of a crashed UFO located somewhere outside the US that is so enormous it can never be moved. "I'm not going to mention the country because I heard of it inside of a closed setting, and I want to protect my classification level," he added. It comes as a Pentagon whistleblower releases 'high-res image of alien mothership' in sign of UFO life.

Speaking to Rob Finnerty on Newsmax, Rep. Burlison voiced his frustration at being unable to personally investigate the alleged craft, despite widespread reports the US government is set to release a significant update on its research into UFOs later this year.

"I'm having a difficult time getting access to facilities that are just within a few miles from my office in Washington, D.C.," Burlison said. He added: "So, to try to attempt to go to another country and get permission at that level is going to be somewhat insurmountable. But it doesn't mean that I'm not going to continue to try."

Burlison added that if he were ever to obtain concrete proof of alien visitors' existence, he would not hesitate to make it public: "If I come under any hard evidence, whether it's physical or video evidence that is absolutely definitive, whilst I'm going to do what I can to protect our national security and our nation's interest, I will not hold back on telling the American people that we are alone or not alone in this universe."

Rep. Burlison added: "That is something that no government has the right to withhold from its people."

Whilst he declined to identify the nation reportedly harboring the "craft", renowned UFO investigator Dr Steven Greer who appeared alongside Burlison in the Newsmax interview, proved far more willing to share specifics.


He stated that he has contact with someone involved in a classified Pentagon program examining these rumored interstellar craft, and this contact "specifically knew of one [alien spaceship] in the mountains outside Seoul, South Korea. It was so huge they had to build a structure around it".

Noting that as a private individual he is not subject to the same secrecy requirements as Rep. Burlison, Greer asserted that multiple alien craft had been "brought down," and that some of them were "bigger than a football field."



Now all that said....I grew up in a family where I was specifically taught that Aliens, Cryptozoological sightings and Ghost (which I've experienced Personally) were ALL created by and tools of Satan and the Devil was creating these things to entice Humans to question the Belief in God and it was some big psyop being run by Satan on the Human Race.

So questions

Are they Real?
if they Are real ..are they Children of God?
Is it possible Satan has entire planets of beings dedicated to him as God?
The Bible Tells me specifically there is a very real and vibrant spirit world....wouldn't this make Ghost Extremely real and viable ?

Is it possible that God created other inhabited planets and they have their own version of the Bible and maybe even their own different path to salvation, relationship and story with God?
 
Multiple US officials as Whistleblowers have confirmed the existence of Aliens and UFO's publicly for the first time ever in the last few years

1. David Grusch

Former U.S. Air Force intelligence officer and representative to the Pentagon’s Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP) Task Force.
Key Claims:

  • Alleged the U.S. government has retrieved several “non‑human origin technical vehicles”, some containing “dead pilots.” [stripes.com]
  • Testified under oath that the U.S. has run a multi‑decade crash retrieval and reverse‑engineering program. [newsnationnow.com]
  • Claimed individuals with direct knowledge told him about non‑human craft and biological remains.

2. Ryan Graves

Former U.S. Navy pilot and Executive Director of Americans for Safe Aerospace.
Key Claims:

  • Testified that U.S. sensor and video data would change the national conversation if the public could see it.
  • Did not allege extraterrestrial craft directly, but supported claims that UAP encounters demonstrate extraordinary, unexplained technology.
    [stripes.com]

3. David Fravor

Former U.S. Navy Commanding Officer, known for the 2004 USS Nimitz “Tic Tac” encounter.
Key Claims:

  • Testified about personal encounters with UAP showcasing flight characteristics beyond known U.S. capabilities.
  • Did not explicitly claim extraterrestrial craft but provided testimony backing the idea that some UAP may not be human-made.
    [newsnationnow.com]

4. Tim Gallaudet

Retired Navy Rear Admiral and former oceanography commander.
Key Claims:

  • Testified about encountering UAP showing “flight and structural characteristics unlike anything in our arsenal.”
  • Stated such encounters occurred in operational Navy training environments.
    [newsweek.com]

5. Michael Gold

Former NASA official.
Key Claims:

  • Testified that secrecy surrounding UAPs is obstructing scientific progress.
  • Suggested non‑human technology may be involved but did not claim first‑hand knowledge.
    [nbcnews.com]

6. Luis Elizondo

Former Pentagon official who once directed the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP).
Key Claims:

  • Asserted in congressional testimony that “UAP are real” and interacting with humanity.
  • Implied advanced intelligence may be involved but did not explicitly claim recovered alien craft.
    [yahoo.com]

Obama said it just last week that statistically it is almost impossible that Aliens don't inhabit other planets but said we have not had any contact yet

Then TODAY we have this story

Congressman says there is a stranded UFO in a country outside of the US that is so big 'there's a building built around it'​


A US congressman claims a foreign nation is in possession of a crashed alien spacecraft so massive that authorities have had to construct an "entire building around it".

Missouri congressman Eric Burlison says he has heard reports of a crashed UFO located somewhere outside the US that is so enormous it can never be moved. "I'm not going to mention the country because I heard of it inside of a closed setting, and I want to protect my classification level," he added. It comes as a Pentagon whistleblower releases 'high-res image of alien mothership' in sign of UFO life.

Speaking to Rob Finnerty on Newsmax, Rep. Burlison voiced his frustration at being unable to personally investigate the alleged craft, despite widespread reports the US government is set to release a significant update on its research into UFOs later this year.

"I'm having a difficult time getting access to facilities that are just within a few miles from my office in Washington, D.C.," Burlison said. He added: "So, to try to attempt to go to another country and get permission at that level is going to be somewhat insurmountable. But it doesn't mean that I'm not going to continue to try."

Burlison added that if he were ever to obtain concrete proof of alien visitors' existence, he would not hesitate to make it public: "If I come under any hard evidence, whether it's physical or video evidence that is absolutely definitive, whilst I'm going to do what I can to protect our national security and our nation's interest, I will not hold back on telling the American people that we are alone or not alone in this universe."

Rep. Burlison added: "That is something that no government has the right to withhold from its people."

Whilst he declined to identify the nation reportedly harboring the "craft", renowned UFO investigator Dr Steven Greer who appeared alongside Burlison in the Newsmax interview, proved far more willing to share specifics.


He stated that he has contact with someone involved in a classified Pentagon program examining these rumored interstellar craft, and this contact "specifically knew of one [alien spaceship] in the mountains outside Seoul, South Korea. It was so huge they had to build a structure around it".

Noting that as a private individual he is not subject to the same secrecy requirements as Rep. Burlison, Greer asserted that multiple alien craft had been "brought down," and that some of them were "bigger than a football field."



Now all that said....I grew up in a family where I was specifically taught that Aliens, Cryptozoological sightings and Ghost (which I've experienced Personally) were ALL created by and tools of Satan and the Devil was creating these things to entice Humans to question the Belief in God and it was some big psyop being run by Satan on the Human Race.

So questions

Are they Real?
if they Are real ..are they Children of God?
Is it possible Satan has entire planets of beings dedicated to him as God?
The Bible Tells me specifically there is a very real and vibrant spirit world....wouldn't this make Ghost Extremely real and viable ?

Is it possible that God created other inhabited planets and they have their own version of the Bible and maybe even their own different path to salvation, relationship and story with God?
“There will be others, not of this fold.”
 
Congressman says there is a stranded UFO in a country outside of the US that is so big 'there's a building built around it'

It's Chernobyl isn't it.
 
South Korea actually, in the Mountains

Seth Meyers Lol GIF by Late Night with Seth Meyers
 
So we have had a lot of posts on religion, how about a few on philosophy? What schools of philosophy or philosophers stand out to you?

I only took one philosophy class in college (Logic and Critical Thinking), and while it was an incredibly useful class, I am pretty much a novice in this topic.
 
So we have had a lot of posts on religion, how about a few on philosophy? What schools of philosophy or philosophers stand out to you?

I only took one philosophy class in college (Logic and Critical Thinking), and while it was an incredibly useful class, I am pretty much a novice in this topic.

Big guess we are all novices here on philosophy.

I've dabbled in some stoics, mostly Marcus Aurelius and Epictetus. Big fan of Epictetus, wish I could live up to his philosophy. Have mentioned secular Buddhism but honestly have just seen some videos and things.

Have this on my reading list, just have not gotten to it yet:

 
Back
Top