NCAA proposing an eligibility policy that gives 5 years following HS graduation or 19th birthday, whichever comes first, with exceptions for religious missions, military service.
Feels like another step in the right direction imo. I’m curious though as to why they believe that this age-based approach will not be defeated in court like the current rules have been multiple times.
Utah hasn't in the Big XII, but they've only been here for 2 years also. Not saying they aren't being insufferable in their own right, but they've accomplished more than Tech in recent history; they just haven't done it here.
I believe they can surpass Tech, but right now Tech IMO is still the "We own everything because of our 1 year" title holders.
I know, I thought the same thing. He was always very against paying players when it was considered 'cheating', but now that it's fair game, I'm sure he would've helped out a ton. I'm also guessing that if he was still around, we probably would've seen Gundy's departure earlier than this year given the results on the field.
I know, I thought the same thing. He was always very against paying players when it was considered 'cheating', but now that it's fair game, I'm sure he would've helped out a ton. I'm also guessing that if he was still around, we probably would've seen Gundy's departure earlier than this year given the results on the field.