ICE

Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche: "He [Alex Pretti] was not protesting peacefully. He was screaming in the face of ICE, he had a phone up right into ICE's face. You tell me: is that protesting peacefully?"

 
Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche: "He [Alex Pretti] was not protesting peacefully. He was screaming in the face of ICE, he had a phone up right into ICE's face. You tell me: is that protesting peacefully?"

well hell, now that you put it that way...punishable by death!!
 
CNN: What evidence do you have that Alex Pretti wanted to massacre law enforcement?

GREG BOVINO:  I believe that the fantastic training that our law enforcement partners have, the fact that they're highly trained, prevented any specific shootings of law enforcement. So good job for our law enforcement in taking him down before he was able to do that.

 
asking cuz I don't know: when a police officer is involved in a shooting, they are put on leave and the shooting is investigated...what about ICE?
According to Bovino: “All agents that were involved in that scene [Alex’s m*rderers] are working, not in Minneapolis but in other locations.”

 
This shooting really got to me.

Charlie Kirk would stick his beck out to defend guys like Alex Pretti.

We can’t know, but I don’t think so.

Charlie Kirk would not have betrayed the cult leader. Maybe some vague “I support his second amendment rights…..” stuff but overall he would have stuck with the “don’t break the law and mess with ICE” theme.
 
We can’t know, but I don’t think so.

Charlie Kirk would not have betrayed the cult leader. Maybe some vague “I support his second amendment rights…..” stuff but overall he would have stuck with the “don’t break the law and mess with ICE” theme.
@OrangeFan69 is workshopping bits for his stand-up gig (I’m being serious in saying this).
 
I’ve seen this video or one w a different angle and there are 2 details that completely take away the “he wasn’t protesting peacefully” and “he put himself next to an armed professional officer.”

The first is the ICE guy’s treatment of the woman in the white coat. Two hand shove to the chest. There was no effort to de escalate or defend. It was an aggressive offensive assault on a woman. This crap right here on a just one of the reasons people are protesting. It’s not bc they want to see undocumented criminals running free it’s the attitude of this regime manifested in its own law enforcement group. Take away the assault this agent perpetrated. That action in and of itself put his other agents at risk of violence against them. It had no intent other than to harm that woman.

The second factor speaks directly to the actions of Pretti in the first 30 seconds of that video. He puts himself at risk not from ICE but others when he steps into the middle of the road to direct traffic safely away from protesters and ICE. Then he puts himself between two women and an agent that had lost all professionalism and was only trying to cause harm.
 
Watch….

Now we are going to get a semantics argument of whether a charge without conviction constitutes a “criminal record”.

So even asserting and taking the numbers in the link Rob cited:

1/3 have no criminal conviction or arrest/charge;

1/3 have no criminal conviction and are entitled to a presumption of innocence associated with their charge;

1/3 have a criminal conviction;

Of the last third with a conviction, a majority of those are for traffic offenses or lower level offenses (i.e., misdemeanors).

That doesn’t sound like going after the worst of the worst to me.

I’ve got no problem with deporting any foreign national convicted of ANY felony or serious misdemeanors like drunk driving, domestic abuse, etc., but that ain’t even what they are doing while claiming they’re only going after the worst of the worst.
This response isn't to you because you know this and agree with it, but it is for others that you were responding to... but even IF we were actually going after the "worst of the worst", to do so without upholding the Constitution, without due process and equal protection, endangers all of us, because due process and equal protection protects all of us.

What have we become?
 
Why is border patrol acting in cities that are nowhere near a border? If border patrol can do that, why does ICE exist?

I thought we were supposed to do more with less and have effective and efficient government services. How is two agencies hiring shoddy employees and doing the same thing efficient or effective.

Again showing there are no small government people. Only I-want people.
 
Last edited:
Why is border patrol acting in cities that are nowhere near a border? If border patrol can do that, why does ICE exist?

I thought we were supposed to do more with less and have effective and efficient government services. How is two agencies hiring shoddy employees and doing the same thing efficient or effective.

Again showing there are no small government people. Only I-want people.
During 2020, the Border Patrol was going at riots/ protests in Portland and I found out they have some weird boundaries that have zero logic to do with the border. 100 miles inland and any city with an international airport. Hence...minneapolis.
 
Back
Top