
well hell, now that you put it that way...punishable by death!!Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche: "He [Alex Pretti] was not protesting peacefully. He was screaming in the face of ICE, he had a phone up right into ICE's face. You tell me: is that protesting peacefully?"
![]()
Ken Klippenstein (@kenklipp) on Threads
Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche: "He [Alex Pretti] was not protesting peacefully. He was screaming in the face of ICE, he had a phone up right into ICE's face. You tell me: is that protesting peacefully?"www.threads.com
According to Bovino: “All agents that were involved in that scene [Alex’s m*rderers] are working, not in Minneapolis but in other locations.”asking cuz I don't know: when a police officer is involved in a shooting, they are put on leave and the shooting is investigated...what about ICE?
This shooting really got to me.
Charlie Kirk would stick his beck out to defend guys like Alex Pretti.
@OrangeFan69 is workshopping bits for his stand-up gig (I’m being serious in saying this).We can’t know, but I don’t think so.
Charlie Kirk would not have betrayed the cult leader. Maybe some vague “I support his second amendment rights…..” stuff but overall he would have stuck with the “don’t break the law and mess with ICE” theme.
I’ve seen this video or one w a different angle and there are 2 details that completely take away the “he wasn’t protesting peacefully” and “he put himself next to an armed professional officer.”![]()
This response isn't to you because you know this and agree with it, but it is for others that you were responding to... but even IF we were actually going after the "worst of the worst", to do so without upholding the Constitution, without due process and equal protection, endangers all of us, because due process and equal protection protects all of us.Watch….
Now we are going to get a semantics argument of whether a charge without conviction constitutes a “criminal record”.
So even asserting and taking the numbers in the link Rob cited:
1/3 have no criminal conviction or arrest/charge;
1/3 have no criminal conviction and are entitled to a presumption of innocence associated with their charge;
1/3 have a criminal conviction;
Of the last third with a conviction, a majority of those are for traffic offenses or lower level offenses (i.e., misdemeanors).
That doesn’t sound like going after the worst of the worst to me.
I’ve got no problem with deporting any foreign national convicted of ANY felony or serious misdemeanors like drunk driving, domestic abuse, etc., but that ain’t even what they are doing while claiming they’re only going after the worst of the worst.
During 2020, the Border Patrol was going at riots/ protests in Portland and I found out they have some weird boundaries that have zero logic to do with the border. 100 miles inland and any city with an international airport. Hence...minneapolis.Why is border patrol acting in cities that are nowhere near a border? If border patrol can do that, why does ICE exist?
I thought we were supposed to do more with less and have effective and efficient government services. How is two agencies hiring shoddy employees and doing the same thing efficient or effective.
Again showing there are no small government people. Only I-want people.
I was straining myself trying to figure out what beck had to do with Charlie Kirk, then I realized the b and the n are next to each other.@OrangeFan69 is workshopping bits for his stand-up gig (I’m being serious in saying this).