ICE

The feds and people of Minnesota aren’t “playing with fire”.

The feds are murdering people of Minnesota.

There is a huge….HUGE…gulf between those two statements.
The people of Minnesota are exercising their right to free speech. Their right to bear arms. Their right to assembly. Their protection against unlawful search and seizure. And they’re literally being murdered for it.

The administration is practically violating every constitutional right listed in our amendments.

But please don’t say a clip was emptied. That’s a bridge too far.
 
If you go fuck with ICE, you’re playing with fire.
So you’re a “comply or die” guy.

Good to know though I didn’t tag you as a bootlicker before now.

The people of Minnesota are exercising their right to free speech. Their right to bear arms. Their right to assembly. Their protection against unlawful search and seizure. And they’re literally being murdered for it.

The administration is practically violating every constitutional right listed in our amendments.

But please don’t say a clip was emptied. That’s a bridge too far.

Whit in 1773: “You fuck with that tea, you’re playing with fire. :rolleyes:
 
A dumb argument over wording. Lord, Whit.

Re: Zzzz’ing playing with fire

Do you understand the meaning of phrase playing with fire?

ICE has fired guns on at least 3 people this month. They shot an another dudes eye out with a rubber bullet or bag. These people were not posing lethal threats against ICE. ICE’s lethal reactions to mild threats are with impunity, at least this far.

It doesn’t matter if ICE is wrong or right in anyone’s mind. These MFers are getting away maming and murder.

So if getting in their way is not playing with fire in your mind, then you’re quite the bad ass risk taker.
 
So you’re a “comply or die” guy.

Good to know though I didn’t tag you as a bootlicker before now.



Whit in 1773: “You fuck with that tea, you’re playing with fire. :rolleyes:

No. I understand the meaning of the analogy “playing with fire.”

It’s taking a risk, Jimmy. If you put yourself if front of a dumbass ICE agent, guess what? You’re risking getting beat or shot. That is playing with fire.

If I’m angry enough to take that risk, I’m not risking my life holding a phone or turning my wheel away.
 
Last edited:
Y’all are making the argument that it’s safe to put yourself in front of ICE when there is a mountain of evidence that it’s not safe.

That doesn’t make me a boot licker. That makes you pant shitting retarded.
 
Y’all are making the argument that it’s safe to put yourself in front of ICE when there is a mountain of evidence that it’s not safe.

That doesn’t make me a boot licker. That makes you pant shitting retarded.
Well I'm definitely stealing the phrase pant shitting retarded from now on. No even giving you credit.
 
No. I understand the meaning of the analogy “playing with fire.”

It’s taking a risk, Jimmy. If you put yourself if front of a dumbass ICE agent, guess what? You’re risking getting beat or shot. That is playing with fire.

If I’m angry enough to take that risk, I’m not risking my life holding a phone or turning my wheel away.
Like I said…..comply or die.
Y’all are making the argument that it’s safe to put yourself in front of ICE when there is a mountain of evidence that it’s not safe.

That doesn’t make me a boot licker. That makes you pant shitting retarded.
We’re not making that argument at all, you moron.

We’re arguing that exercising your 1st Amendment rights….exercising your 2nd Amendment rights shouldn’t be viewed….that it shouldn’t BE….taking a risk. We’re arguing that saying exercising you constitutional rights is taking a risk of getting murdered is a bootlicking mentality.

We’re also arguing that to say both ICE and the people of Minnesota are “playing with fire” puts the responsibility for these murders on both parties…..and there is only one side of this equation responsible for the murders.
 
Exercising your constitutional rights = playing with fire…..

Exercising your constitutional rights in Minnesota = risking having your life taken by ICE,,,,

If you don’t want to be murdered by ICE, don’t exercise your constitutional rights in front of them….

Is an extraordinary bootlicking attitude.

Comply or die.
 
Like I said…..comply or die.

We’re not making that argument at all, you moron.

We’re arguing that exercising your 1st Amendment rights….exercising your 2nd Amendment rights shouldn’t be viewed….that it shouldn’t BE….taking a risk. We’re arguing that saying exercising you constitutional rights is taking a risk of getting murdered is a bootlicking mentality.

We’re also arguing that to say both ICE and the people of Minnesota are “playing with fire” puts the responsibility for these murders on both parties…..and there is only one side of this equation responsible for the murders.

HFS. I cannot imagine being this dense.

I saw a guy exercising his 1st amendment right today get his ass beat and gunned down just weeks after another person did the same and ended up the same. In no way am I arguing that the victims were in the wrong. It’s asinine that I even have to spell that out to someone as smart as you. What I am arguing is that exercising your rights against ICE is a risk.

If you disagree, fine. If you don’t like it, idgaf. But I guarantee you don’t ever put yourself in Pretti and Good’s position and it’s because you understand it’s a dangerous risk.
 
Exercising your constitutional rights = playing with fire…..

Exercising your constitutional rights in Minnesota = risking having your life taken by ICE,,,,

If you don’t want to be murdered by ICE, don’t exercise your constitutional rights in front of them….

Is an extraordinary bootlicking attitude.

Comply or die.

Easy for you to say from your easy chair.
 
The people of Minnesota are exercising their right to free speech. Their right to bear arms. Their right to assembly. Their protection against unlawful search and seizure. And they’re literally being murdered for it.

The administration is practically violating every constitutional right listed in our amendments.

But please don’t say a clip was emptied. That’s a bridge too far.

This is all correct.
 
Back
Top