ICE

[TheMonkey]

The feds and people of Minnesota aren’t “playing with fire”.

The feds are murdering people of Minnesota.

There is a huge….HUGE…gulf between those two statements.

The people of Minnesota are exercising their right to free speech. Their right to bear arms. Their right to assembly. Their protection against unlawful search and seizure. And they’re literally being murdered for it.

The administration is practically violating every constitutional right listed in our amendments.

But please don’t say a clip was emptied. That’s a bridge too far.

 

[CowboyJD]

If you go fuck with ICE, you’re playing with fire.

So you’re a “comply or die” guy.

Good to know though I didn’t tag you as a bootlicker before now.

The people of Minnesota are exercising their right to free speech. Their right to bear arms. Their right to assembly. Their protection against unlawful search and seizure. And they’re literally being murdered for it.

The administration is practically violating every constitutional right listed in our amendments.

But please don’t say a clip was emptied. That’s a bridge too far.

Whit in 1773: “You f*ck with that tea, you’re playing with fire.

 

[osuwhit]

A dumb argument over wording. Lord, Whit.

Re: Zzzz’ing playing with fire

Do you understand the meaning of phrase playing with fire?

ICE has fired guns on at least 3 people this month. They shot an another dudes eye out with a rubber bullet or bag. These people were not posing lethal threats against ICE. ICE’s lethal reactions to mild threats are with impunity, at least this far.

It doesn’t matter if ICE is wrong or right in anyone’s mind. These MFers are getting away maming and murder.

So if getting in their way is not playing with fire in your mind, then you’re quite the bad azz risk taker.

 

[osuwhit]

So you’re a “comply or die” guy.

Good to know though I didn’t tag you as a bootlicker before now.



Whit in 1773: “You fuck with that tea, you’re playing with fire.

No. I understand the meaning of the analogy “playing with fire.”

It’s taking a risk, Jimmy. If you put yourself if front of a dumbass ICE agent, guess what? You’re risking getting beat or shot. That is playing with fire.

If I’m angry enough to take that risk, I’m not risking my life holding a phone or turning my wheel away.

 

[osuwhit]

Y’all are making the argument that it’s safe to put yourself in front of ICE when there is a mountain of evidence that it’s not safe.

That doesn’t make me a boot licker. That makes you pant sh!tting stupid.

 

[Big Huck]

Y’all are making the argument that it’s safe to put yourself in front of ICE when there is a mountain of evidence that it’s not safe.

That doesn’t make me a boot licker. That makes you pant shitting retarded.

Well I'm definitely stealing the phrase pant sh!tting stupid from now on. No even giving you credit.

 

[CowboyJD]

No. I understand the meaning of the analogy “playing with fire.”

It’s taking a risk, Jimmy. If you put yourself if front of a dumbazz ICE agent, guess what? You’re risking getting beat or shot. That is playing with fire.

If I’m angry enough to take that risk, I’m not risking my life holding a phone or turning my wheel away.

Like I said…..comply or die.

Y’all are making the argument that it’s safe to put yourself in front of ICE when there is a mountain of evidence that it’s not safe.

That doesn’t make me a boot licker. That makes you pant sh!tting stupid.

We’re not making that argument at all, you moron.

We’re arguing that exercising your 1st Amendment rights….exercising your 2nd Amendment rights shouldn’t be viewed….that it shouldn’t BE….taking a risk. We’re arguing that saying exercising you constitutional rights is taking a risk of getting murdered is a bootlicking mentality.

We’re also arguing that to say both ICE and the people of Minnesota are “playing with fire” puts the responsibility for these murders on both parties…..and there is only one side of this equation responsible for the murders.

 

[CowboyJD]

Exercising your constitutional rights = playing with fire…..

Exercising your constitutional rights in Minnesota = risking having your life taken by ICE,,,,

If you don’t want to be murdered by ICE, don’t exercise your constitutional rights in front of them….

Is an extraordinary bootlicking attitude.

Comply or die.

 

[osuwhit]

Like I said…..comply or die.

We’re not making that argument at all, you moron.

We’re arguing that exercising your 1st Amendment rights….exercising your 2nd Amendment rights shouldn’t be viewed….that it shouldn’t BE….taking a risk. We’re arguing that saying exercising you constitutional rights is taking a risk of getting murdered is a bootlicking mentality.

We’re also arguing that to say both ICE and the people of Minnesota are “playing with fire” puts the responsibility for these murders on both parties…..and there is only one side of this equation responsible for the murders.

HFS. I cannot imagine being this dense.

I saw a guy exercising his 1st amendment right today get his ass beat and gunned down just weeks after another person did the same and ended up the same. In no way am I arguing that the victims were in the wrong. It’s asinine that I even have to spell that out to someone as smart as you. What I am arguing is that exercising your rights against ICE is a risk.

If you disagree, fine. If you don’t like it, idgaf. But I guarantee you don’t ever put yourself in Pretti and Good’s position and it’s because you understand it’s a dangerous risk.

 

[osuwhit]

Exercising your constitutional rights = playing with fire…..

Exercising your constitutional rights in Minnesota = risking having your life taken by ICE,,,,

If you don’t want to be murdered by ICE, don’t exercise your constitutional rights in front of them….

Is an extraordinary bootlicking attitude.

Comply or die.

Easy for you to say from your easy chair.

 

[CowboyJD]

Easy for you to say from your easy chair.

Sure thing, bootlicker.

 

[osuwhit]

Sure thing, bootlicker.

Thats mighty tough of you, Jimmy.

 

[CowboyJD]

Thats mighty tough of you, Jimmy.

Sure thing, bootlicker.

 

[osuwhit]

The people of Minnesota are exercising their right to free speech. Their right to bear arms. Their right to assembly. Their protection against unlawful search and seizure. And they’re literally being murdered for it.

The administration is practically violating every constitutional right listed in our amendments.

But please don’t say a clip was emptied. That’s a bridge too far.

This is all correct.

 

[cowboyinexile]

Cim was a good one, I wish he was still around.

If Cim was here he would have been defending the agents actions today.

 

[RxCowboy]

My brother has voted for Trump three times. My brother last night, "I don't recognize the Republican party." Me, "Remember what you gave me for my birthday in 2016?" Him, "No." Me, "You gave me a mug with a picture of Reagan crying with the caption 'It's my party and I'll cry if I want to.' How you feel now is how I felt then."

I want ICE to do perform their basic function. I want the Constitution upheld. This ain't it.

Just in case you think I'm kidding about the mug...

 

[osuwhit]

If Cim was here he would have been defending the agents actions today.

And that is 100% not me

 

[osuwhit]

Hopefully the left sees value in 2A now because this is a massive red flag.

 

[Polds4OSU]

 

[cowboyinexile]

And that is 100% not me

I wasn't saying it was you just so we are clear.

He was arguably the most partisan person on the board. If Fox News came out and said go root for the squats he's the only person on this board I would expect to start playing that terrible song.