GOP Rep George Santos Arrested, charged with 13 crimes by DoJ

Polds4OSU

Marshall

Brazil may actually attempt to extradite and charge him there as well as apparently they have been after him for numerous crimes there.

George Santos’ Lies Finally Catch Up With Him in Stunning Indictment​


The long trail of lies has finally caught up with Rep. George Santos, who was indicted on Wednesday for enriching himself by defrauding political donors, cheating the federal government to get COVID relief funds, and faking House disclosure forms.

The Justice Department unsealed a 13-count indictment Wednesday morning that detailed the variety of ways Santos used his brief political rise to dupe taxpayers and donors—an eagerly awaited law enforcement action that followed months of investigative news reports about his wide ranging fraudster lifestyle.

Santos was placed into custody Wednesday morning, according to the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of New York. He is expected to be arraigned later today.

Investigators have been probing Santos’ campaign and financial affairs for months. Since being elected last year, the congressman has been accused of lying about his life story, work history, and education, and questions have been raised surrounding unusual payments and loans surrounding his campaign.

Despite the mounting scrutiny, Santos was apparently surprised when federal prosecutors filed sealed charges in the Eastern District of New York on Tuesday. “This is news to me,” he told the Associated Press when approached for comment. “You’re the first to call me about this.”


Aside from the allegations which led to his criminal charges, Santos had previously been accused of fabricating large swathes of his biography— including not disclosing a marriage and lying that his mother was killed on 9/11—as well as stealing money intended to pay for a veteran’s dog’s surgery, using a stolen checkbook to buy clothes in Brazil, running a credit card fraud scheme, and possibly making up an “assassination attempt.”

Prosecutors allege that starting in Sept. 2022, when Santos began his congressional campaign, he operated a limited liability company that he used to defraud political supporters. Santos also allegedly enlisted the help of a political consultant, named “Person 1” in the indictment, to tell donors that that money would be used to help his campaign, including TV ads.

The indictment also details steps Santos and “Person 1” took to enlist potential donors, including sending multiple emails and texts to entice them to help the campaign. In one Oct. 4, 2022 email, “Person 1” sent an email to one donor insisting they were trying to “raise another $700,000 dollars to reach our goal of $1.5 million to invest in [DEVOLDER SANTOS’s] race.”

The communication tactics ultimately led to at least two unnamed donors to each transfer $25,000 to a bank account that Santos allegedly controlled. Shortly after the funds were received into the company bank account, the indictment states, the money was transferred into Santos’ personal account.

The indictment states that thousands of dollars meant for the campaign were used on personal experiences, including “luxury designer clothing and credit card payments.” Santos also allegedly used the money to make cash withdrawals, payments on personal debts, and send at least one bank transfer to a personal associate.

But prosecutors say Santos compounded that lie by claiming that it was a 501(c)(4) nonprofit when it wasn’t—something investigators say they backed up with a text message Santos sent to his associate that assured the person that the firm was just “a small C4” with “no limits” on contributions that served “just to help this race.”

What’s worse, Santos’ team apparently put it all in writing to donors, with the feds citing multiple emails that detailed how the company was trying to “raise another $700,000 dollars to reach our goal of $1.5 million,” with a group that was formed “exclusively” to help Santos and would be spent “directly on supporting George and his election.”

Prosecutors also accused Santos of illegally tapping taxpayer money meant to help Americans who suddenly became jobless due to the sharp economic downturn during the COVID pandemic’s nationwide business closures. The indictment states Santos applied to receive unemployment insurance benefits from New York State and federal funds that came from the Coronavirus Aid Relief and Economic Security Act. It accused him of lying about being unemployed for more than a year, from March 2020 until April 2021, noting how he certified to the government every week that he was still without a job—even though he was actively making $120,000 a year as a regional director at an investment firm headquartered in Melbourne, Florida.


He ended up earning a double salary, with an extra $24,744 in federal taxpayer funds and another $20,304 from New York.

Ironically, Santos has recently supported congressional bills that would make it easier for the feds to clamp down on these alleged crimes—and demand more of anyone seeking government help. In March, he co-sponsored a Republican bill that would incentivize states to more aggressively investigate COVID unemployment insurance fraud and double the statute of limitations for that crime, essentially doubling the time federal prosecutors have to charge people with the very thing for which Santos is accused.

Then in April, he voted to pass another Republican bill that would require able-bodied adults to work or volunteer at least 20 hours a week to remain eligible for Medicaid benefits. Santos actually initially withheld his vote on that legislation because he didn’t think the work requirements were tough enough; he wanted 30 hours a week, not just 20.

But according to investigators, Santos went even further when he carried these lies over to mandated federal disclosure forms required of every member of Congress. The indictment alleges that Santos hid how much money he was actually making on his House of Representatives financial disclosure paperwork, claiming that he made $55,000 from a second company—a higher number that disguised how he was actually getting paid by the Florida investment firm.

Santos only made it worse for himself last year, when he turned in House disclosure forms that made it seem like he had earned a $750,000 salary from his mysterious “Devolder Organization,” got anywhere between $1 million and $5 million in company dividends, owned a checking account with $100,001 to $250,000, and had anywhere from $1 million to $5 million sitting in his savings account. In reality, investigators charged, all of those numbers were simply made up.

Given that Santos is a congressman, the Justice Department’s public integrity unit in Washington, D.C., is involved in the investigation. According to court records, the federal prosecution team includes two members of that unit: Jacob Steiner, who recently took down a former Arkansas state senator and two health care executives over a multimillion dollar bribery scheme, and Jolee Porter, who nailed an Atlanta city official for steering city contracts in exchange for bribes.
 
Many have said that the fate of Santos rests in the hands of Speaker of the House Kevin McCarthy, who said on Wednesday morning that he will be standing with Santos and will not ask him to resign. Even if McCarthy wasn’t backing Santos, Buck doubts the Speaker of the House’s power in this situation.

“On some level, McCarthy doesn’t really have the ability to push him out unless they bring that almost unprecedented vote to the floor,” Buck said.

To date, only five members of the House of Representatives have been expelled: John B. Clark, John W. Reid, Henry C. Burnett, Michael J. Myers and James Traficant. Of those, three were removed for supporting the Confederate rebellion, a historic detail that puts the rarity of Santos’ situation into perspective.

Buck also said that Santos stepping down will come down to “peer pressure” and that the representative is “deeply unpopular” with officials at the Capitol. “Members are sick and tired of talking about it,” Buck said. “George Santos is nothing but an anvil around their necks.”

“I’m sure they would love to find a way to push him out but I doubt that this is somebody who’s going to be rational enough to think that maybe it’s a good idea to leave,” Buck said.

 
list of his known lies


Even before he was sworn into Congress, the Long Island Republican had faced calls to resign from both Republicans and Democrats over the numerous lies he told about his biography.

Included among the lies and accusations:

 
Guy’s a complete tool! After some mis-hire situations at the state I learned 30-40 years ago you could pretty much make up whatever backstory you wanted and someone would have to put in some real work to out you for your lies, but who doesn’t know every aspect of your past is now available to anyone with a smartphone and a few minutes to kill? Hopefully he gets what’s coming to him! Now let’s do Elizabeth Warren!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
list of his known lies


Even before he was sworn into Congress, the Long Island Republican had faced calls to resign from both Republicans and Democrats over the numerous lies he told about his biography.

Included among the lies and accusations:

Good to see you found the new site Binman. I actually like you posting all the media stuff, saves me from having to go out into the internet wilds and look myself.
 

George Santos admits to theft in Brazil court​

Republican congressman George Santos has admitted to theft and signed a deal with Brazilian authorities to drop the criminal charges in a 2008 case.

As part of the deal, Mr Santos has been given 30 days to pay restitution and fines for the case to be dropped.

He is still facing more serious federal charges in the US of fraud, money laundering and theft of public funds.

Mr Santos has pleaded not guilty to the US federal charges.

The 34-year-old lawmaker, who was elected to the House of Representatives in November, has been dogged by accusations of falsehoods and fraud throughout his brief career on Capitol Hill.

Among those were allegations that Mr Santos spent about $700 (£561) using a false name and stolen cheques in the city of Niterói, near Rio de Janeiro in Brazil, to buy items at a shop including a pair of sneakers in 2008, when he was 19.

The case had been suspended because Brazilian authorities were unable to locate him, but it was revived after Mr Santos took office in the US.

On Thursday, Mr Santos confessed to the theft in a virtual appearance before a Brazilian criminal court. He was given 30 days to pay $2,000 (£1,600) in fines and $2,800 to the shopkeeper, according to local news outlets.
 

McCarthy changes tune to say he will not back Santos re-election bid after arrest​

Utah GOP Senator Mitt Romney led the calls for him to go, saying: “He has demonstrated by his untruthfulness that he should not be in the United States Congress – perhaps should not even be on the public streets.”

House Speaker Kevin McCarthy has now said he will not back Mr Santos’s proposed re-election bid.

Key Points​

  • Kevin McCarthy flip flops on George Santos and says he won’t support indicted congressman’s re-election bid
  • George Santos voting on employment fraud bill – 24 hours after being arrested for employment fraud
  • Inside George Santos’ drag queen days as ‘Kitara Ravache’ - and how his ‘young and fun’ past was exposed
  • Expel George Santos? Republican leaders aren’t ready to take that step
  • From resume lies to criminal charges: A timeline of George Santos’ many scandals

 

George Santos' staff hand-delivered letters to fellow House Republicans thanking them for showing 'courage' by blocking his expulsion from Congress​


Rep. George Santos of New York sent thank-you notes to Republicans who helped block a vote on expelling him from the House of Representatives last week.

Several House GOP sources told Insider on Monday that staffers for the New York Republican delivered the letters to their offices. It was not immediately clear if the letter had gone to every single lawmaker who voted to protect Santos.

"I want to personally thank you for your support in referring the vote for my expulsion to the Ethics Committee," reads the letter from Santos. "This has been an especially difficult time in my life, and I want to serve my constituents the best I can."

Santos went on to point to the need for Republican unity — a key motivating factor behind House Speaker Kevin McCarthy declining to push Santos to resign, despite the New York congressman's recent 13-count federal criminal indictment for wire fraud and money laundering as well as his admission to an astonishing series of lies about his background.

"Now more than ever, the Republican majority needs to stick together, and you demonstrated great dedication and courage by putting differences aside to allow the proper process to play out," the letter concludes.

In a statement to Insider, Santos spokeswoman Gabrielle Lipsky said the congressman sent the letters because he "wanted to express his thanks to his fellow members for allowing the process to play out so that the 118th Congress can focus on the critical issues facing our country, starting with border security and addressing the issue of the debt ceiling."

Rep. George Santos' letter to fellow Republican lawmakers.

Rep. George Santos' letter to fellow Republican lawmakers. House Republican Source
Last week, Democratic Rep. Robert Garcia offered a privileged resolution that would have expelled Santos from Congress if it had received two-thirds majority support in the chamber.

Under House rules, a vote on the matter had to be scheduled within two days.

Republicans, arguing that Santos has not been convicted of a crime yet and seeking to prevent rank-and-file GOP lawmakers from having to vote directly on the controversial congressman's fate, instead moved to refer the resolution to the House Committee on Ethics.

That motion passed by a 221-204 party-line vote on Wednesday, with seven House Democrats — most of which sit on the ethics panel — choosing to vote "present."

It still remains unclear how the Ethics Committee, which had already launched an investigation into Santos, will proceed from here.

The committee is historically known to drag its feet, and often halts its investigations into lawmakers when asked to do so by outside prosecutors.

But the committee has reportedly refused to do that this time, raising the prospect that the committee could soon take action on Santos.
 

Who paid the $500,000 to bail George Santos out of jail? We'll probably find out on Thursday.​


  • A group of three people are on the hook for $500,000 to keep Rep. George Santos out of jail.
  • The scandal-plagued congressman has fought hard to keep their identities secret.
  • But his latest appeal was denied, and their identities will be publicly released on Thursday.
America is about to find out who bailed Republican Rep. George Santos of New York out of jail after he was indicted on federal charges last month.

On Thursday at noon Eastern Time, documents revealing the identities of the three people who paid the scandal-plagued congressman's $500,000 bond will be unsealed after US District Judge Joanna Seybert denied Santos' most recent appeal.

The order, entered late on Tuesday, allows the congressman two days to find new suretors for his bail if the original individuals wish to have their names remain secret.

Santos has fought hard to keep the identities of those individuals secret, with his lawyer arguing in a recent court filing that "the political temperature in this Country and acts of political violence that occur" necessitates it.

According to federal prosecutors, Santos personally stole donations to his Long Island campaign operation, illegally took pandemic employment funds, and lied to Congress on financial disclosure documents.

The judge allowed Santos to walk free instead of going to jail ahead of trial on the condition that he stays in Washington, DC and New York, and agrees to a $500,000 bond. Three people signed up to be guarantors for the bond. But in a highly unusual decision, the magistrate judge who imposed the bond allowed the identities of those bail sponsors to remain secret.

In court filings, Santos's lawyer Joseph Murray has indicated that at least one bail sponsor was a family member, but feared they would back out of the bond if their identities were disclosed. One of the three people who originally agreed to sponsor the bond already dropped out, Murray said.

Some have raised questions as to whether the bond was paid — including partially or indirectly — by Guo Wengui, an exiled Chinese billionaire facing federal fraud charges that Santos began to vocally defend shortly before his indictment.

In recent weeks, Santos has continued to align himself with Guo's cause, including attending an event held at a mansion associated with the billionaire and even introducing a bill that he dubbed the "GUO Act."
 

Who paid the $500,000 to bail George Santos out of jail? We'll probably find out on Thursday.​


  • A group of three people are on the hook for $500,000 to keep Rep. George Santos out of jail.
  • The scandal-plagued congressman has fought hard to keep their identities secret.
  • But his latest appeal was denied, and their identities will be publicly released on Thursday.
America is about to find out who bailed Republican Rep. George Santos of New York out of jail after he was indicted on federal charges last month.

On Thursday at noon Eastern Time, documents revealing the identities of the three people who paid the scandal-plagued congressman's $500,000 bond will be unsealed after US District Judge Joanna Seybert denied Santos' most recent appeal.

The order, entered late on Tuesday, allows the congressman two days to find new suretors for his bail if the original individuals wish to have their names remain secret.

Santos has fought hard to keep the identities of those individuals secret, with his lawyer arguing in a recent court filing that "the political temperature in this Country and acts of political violence that occur" necessitates it.

According to federal prosecutors, Santos personally stole donations to his Long Island campaign operation, illegally took pandemic employment funds, and lied to Congress on financial disclosure documents.

The judge allowed Santos to walk free instead of going to jail ahead of trial on the condition that he stays in Washington, DC and New York, and agrees to a $500,000 bond. Three people signed up to be guarantors for the bond. But in a highly unusual decision, the magistrate judge who imposed the bond allowed the identities of those bail sponsors to remain secret.

In court filings, Santos's lawyer Joseph Murray has indicated that at least one bail sponsor was a family member, but feared they would back out of the bond if their identities were disclosed. One of the three people who originally agreed to sponsor the bond already dropped out, Murray said.

Some have raised questions as to whether the bond was paid — including partially or indirectly — by Guo Wengui, an exiled Chinese billionaire facing federal fraud charges that Santos began to vocally defend shortly before his indictment.

In recent weeks, Santos has continued to align himself with Guo's cause, including attending an event held at a mansion associated with the billionaire and even introducing a bill that he dubbed the "GUO Act."
File has been unsealed. Turns out it was his Father and his Aunt who guaranteed to fund the $500,000 bail if Santos doesn't show up for court. No money was actually needed for his bail. The documents do list 3 funding sources though, however
Per the documents there was a 3rd funding source who backed out prior to providing any money due to the media interest of revealing the names of the people who were paying the bail and the reluctance of the judge to order that info be kept private. The 3rd party never provided money and was listed as a payee but not by name on the document as they didn't actually provide $$.s

His father is a painter in NYC and his Aunt is a US Postal Worker.
 
Last edited:
File has been unsealed. Turns out it was his Father and his Aunt who funded the $500,000 bail. The documents do list 3 funding sources though, however
Per the documents there was a 3rd funding source who backed out prior to providing any money due to the media interest of revealing the names of the people who were paying the bail and the reluctance of the judge to order that info be kept private. The 3rd party never provided money and was listed as a payee but not by name on the document as they didn't actually provide $$.s

His father is a painter in NYC and his Aunt is a US Postal Worker.


Neither relative secured the bond with cash or property, according to a court order that was among the documents unsealed Thursday. But Santos’ father and aunt “agreed to be personally responsible” for the congressman’s compliance with the terms of his release, the order noted.
 
Why does this dude apparently not get bail the same as everyone else?
he does, no one said he didn't deserve bail.......He deserves every bit of scrutiny and oversight he his getting though. He has already admitted to lying, is still alleged to be lying about 100's of other things as well too, and has been charged with 13 crimes and refuses to give up his elected position in Congress during it despite
His own county and state party officials have asked him to step down and he won't and even other members of his own party in Congress have asked him to step down because what has been proven he has lied about so far.

He 100% deserves bail. He 100% deserves all the other crap he is catching too. He has no one to blame it on but himself.
 
he does, no one said he didn't deserve bail.......He deserves every bit of scrutiny and oversight he his getting though. He has already admitted to lying, is still alleged to be lying about 100's of other things as well too, and has been charged with 13 crimes and refuses to give up his elected position in Congress during it despite
His own county and state party officials have asked him to step down and he won't and even other members of his own party in Congress have asked him to step down because what has been proven he has lied about so far.

He 100% deserves bail. He 100% deserves all the other crap he is catching too. He has no one to blame it on but himself.
He should be able to post bail without the payers being scrutinized. That’s not equal treatment.
 
He should be able to post bail without the payers being scrutinized. That’s not equal treatment.
well his lawyer kinda upped the ante on the whole thing when his lawyer asked the judge to keep them secret because his lawyer argued that their lives would be in danger if they were revealed and then made the plea that his client would rather stay in Jail and skip bail if the people footing the bill weren't kept secret

His lawyer made a big deal out of it in court which peaked the Media interest that much more and made a spectacle of it.

And the whole crux of it...it is a no money bail. No one had to pay anything. They just had to guarantee they would pay $500,000 if George doesn't show up for court.
 
well his lawyer kinda upped the ante on the whole thing when his lawyer asked the judge to keep them secret because his lawyer argued that their lives would be in danger if they were revealed and then made the plea that his client would rather stay in Jail and skip bail if the people footing the bill weren't kept secret

His lawyer made a big deal out of it in court which peaked the Media interest that much more and made a spectacle of it.

And the whole crux of it...it is a no money bail. No one had to pay anything. They just had to guarantee they would pay $500,000 if George doesn't show up for court.
Sure
 
He should be able to post bail without the payers being scrutinized. That’s not equal treatment.
Equal to whom? If he is a public official, shouldn't any financial benefit he get be scrutinized? Otherwise, someone could provide the equivalent of a campaign donation as "bail" or some other financial gift.
 
Equal to whom? If he is a public official, shouldn't any financial benefit he get be scrutinized? Otherwise, someone could provide the equivalent of a campaign donation as "bail" or some other financial gift.
Or his dad could "sell" some of his "paintings" for astronomical prices to anonymous buyers and use that money to fund the bail if need be. Just spitballing here 🤷‍♂️
 
Back
Top