American Healthcare continues to go backward

Here’s a top CDC official claiming that the U.S. losing its measles elimination status would be “the cost of doing business.”

 
BERNIE SANDERS: Do vaccines cause autism?

BHATTACHARYA: I do not believe that the measles vaccine causes autism

SANDERS: Nah. Uh uh. I didn't ask measles. Do vaccines cause autism?

BHATTACHARYA: I have not seen a study that suggests any single vaccine causes autism

 
BERNIE SANDERS: Do vaccines cause autism?

BHATTACHARYA: I do not believe that the measles vaccine causes autism

SANDERS: Nah. Uh uh. I didn't ask measles. Do vaccines cause autism?

BHATTACHARYA: I have not seen a study that suggests any single vaccine causes autism


Are you just posting this for info?

I can't see a single thing wrong with what he said?
 
Are you just posting this for info?

I can't see a single thing wrong with what he said?
He could have said it the other way, studies have ruled out the possibility that vaccines cause autism. They way he said it the first time, “measles” left open the possibility that other vaccines cause autism, and the second time that there still could be evidence that they do. Those are weasel answers.
 
He could have said it the other way, studies have ruled out the possibility that vaccines cause autism. They way he said it the first time, “measles” left open the possibility that other vaccines cause autism, and the second time that there still could be evidence that they do. Those are weasel answers.
What I took from his last answer and I wish Bernie would have followed up is that the Dr said (paraphrasing in quotes) “He has not seen a study where a SINGLE vaccine causes autism.” I took this as homage to the current practice of HHS dancing around the vaccine causation debate and their flirtation w autism rates possibly being linked to multiple bring administered at one time.

Maybe it’s just my distrust of current HHS and White House.
 
What I took from his last answer and I wish Bernie would have followed up is that the Dr said (paraphrasing in quotes) “He has not seen a study where a SINGLE vaccine causes autism.” I took this as homage to the current practice of HHS dancing around the vaccine causation debate and their flirtation w autism rates possibly being linked to multiple bring administered at one time.

Maybe it’s just my distrust of current HHS and White House.
Good catch. Yes, it was a weasely answer.
 
Good catch. Yes, it was a weasely answer.
It’s just all so stupid. I don’t agree w the “Whole Foods Moms” position on vaccines but it for the most part seems to align w how they treat all aspects of their life ranging from vaccines to micro plastics to processed foods and so on.

The recent Magastani position on vaccines is being led by grifters and influencers who get paid to post.

Had dinner w a friend who is Magastani adjacent and bc of pandemic refuses to now get vaccinated. He’s had the flu now 3 straight winters.

Kicker is he just lost 30 pounds on a non FDA approved Chinese GLP1 type black market medicine and tried to get me to take it. I asked him “Are you nuckin futs? You won’t take a flu shot but you’ll take a chemical from China that comes in a package you can’t even read that was sold to you by a pastor from your church”.

True story. Won’t take vaccines but will take this stuff bc a pastor recommended it.
 
He could have said it the other way, studies have ruled out the possibility that vaccines cause autism. They way he said it the first time, “measles” left open the possibility that other vaccines cause autism, and the second time that there still could be evidence that they do. Those are weasel answers.

Studies have not ruled out the possibility that vaccines cause autism. Absolutes just are not generally science. Science speaks in probabilities, not absolutes almost always.

And the sentence before the one quoted was Sanders saying "I appreciate your thoughts on measles" so a response to the measles vaccine is not inappropriate like the way Bondi and Hegseth just answer with random nonsense.

I think "you are with us or against us" talk is dangerous. I don't agree with everything Bhattacharya says but he is not an antiscience loon. He does speak about getting back the public trust on things like vaccines. He is as anti-RFK as that position is going to get right now. If he goes away, it would be worse. If he spoke anywhere like you did, he would be fired.
 
Studies have not ruled out the possibility that vaccines cause autism. Absolutes just are not generally science. Science speaks in probabilities, not absolutes almost always.
Oh, steross, in order for it to be "science" it has to be "science" from the outset, and vaccines and autism was never science. The whole premise put forth by Andrew Wakefield originally linking vaccines to autism was fraudulent. Wakefield was disgraced, the paper was retracted. Yet the fraud has persisted and the goalposts keep shifting. It's now multiple vaccines given at once, or the sequence of vaccines, or vaccines given too close together and thus the weasel answers from Bhattacharya. Yet clinical trial after clinical trial after clinical trial has failed to find any evidence of a causal link. It. has. been. disproven. Because there was never any credible theory or hypothesis to begin with. It was a fraud. People were duped. People cling to the dupe because they are desperate for hope that there will be a bad guy, or that a cure will be found.
 
Oh, steross, in order for it to be "science" it has to be "science" from the outset, and vaccines and autism was never science. The whole premise put forth by Andrew Wakefield originally linking vaccines to autism was fraudulent. Wakefield was disgraced, the paper was retracted. Yet the fraud has persisted and the goalposts keep shifting. It's now multiple vaccines given at once, or the sequence of vaccines, or vaccines given too close together and thus the weasel answers from Bhattacharya. Yet clinical trial after clinical trial after clinical trial has failed to find any evidence of a causal link. It. has. been. disproven. Because there was never any credible theory or hypothesis to begin with. It was a fraud. People were duped. People cling to the dupe because they are desperate for hope that there will be a bad guy, or that a cure will be found.

You know that is not how it works.

If there was never a credible theory, then there never should have been a single study of it. We have never tested blue pajamas as the cause as that is not credible. Of course, vaccines were a credible hypothesis which is why it is often tested. It is extremely unlikely that there is any causation of autism from current vaccines. However, science can only give strength of probabilities. It cannot prove the negative and does not try. As AI gets better, they could find a tiny signal in vaccination of fair skinned kids only in the winter months that is too weak to pick up in the current studies and from a mechanism we do not yet understand. Don't give up on being scientific just to fight with people who are not scientific.

We both believe that autism isn't from vaccine and there is no flying spaghetti monster. The lack of a single sighting of a FSM makes it scientifically improbable, but not disproven as a possibility. One can show up tomorrow and the science changes.

Don't try to take that fundamental brilliance of science away just to try to win a pissing contest with anti-vax ignorance.
 
Back
Top