[DISCLAIMER: I HATE TRUMP AND AM NOT DEFENDING HIM]
The judge in the "hush money case" disallowed the testimony of the chair of the federal election commission because he was going to say that it wasn't a campaign contribution and therefore the entire case falls apart. And it was past the statute of limitations. There is appealable error after error. The case should never have been brought. I don't know if Merchan could throw out the verdict at this point or declare a mistrial, but I think he could, or sentence Trump to nothing. But I think if it makes it to an appellate court it will be overturned.
In the "fraud" case, there was no victim. The lenders didn't take the valuations at face value, they did their due diligence, as required. The lenders were paid all that they were owed. The fines were specifically intended to drain Trump of money to prevent him from campaigning. The questions on appeal is, would this case have been brought if it had been anyone other than Trump, and would the fines have been so large if the defendant had been anyone other than Trump? I think the answers are obvious and it will be overturned.
The documents case is never going to trial. The prosecutor was illegally hired. Biden did the same thing or worse (he was a Senator and took documents) and the only thing protecting him from prosecution is dementia. And yes, that is a tu quoque, but it's also true. For the sake of the country, this needs to go away and we need to do a better job of protecting our sensitive documents.
The Georgia election trial is a real sore spot with me, because as I have said many times, the reason why I am no longer a Republican is because of Jan 6. But, frankly, Fani Willis has screwed the pooch (and her prosecuting attorney) and this one is dead where it stands.
The lawfare failed. People saw through it and voted for him anyway. It in fact had the opposite effect and paradoxically made him more popular. You need to learn the lesson and stop with the "34 felonies" because if/when they are overturned you're going to have egg on your face.
I'm not going to get in a legal tit-for-tat with you as I'm not very knowledgeable on this type of law. But, I will say that I have read other opinions on these that conclude the opposite of what you are trying to say. To be honest, we sort of live in a post-truth world. The "truth" that people see is the "truth" they want to see.