Lev Parnes GOP "star witness "destroys Biden impeachment as he testify it was all fake

Doesn't matter. Damage is done.

Fake news spreading fake lies, or they were coerced by the clinton crime family to retract. Or the people who still believe it can't read.

It's also one of the reasons why the GOP is trying to paint Russia as an ally.
 
It's also a calculated ploy by the GOP. Even if they lose, they win with their base. If this impeachment is a complete clown show scam, then ALL impeachments must be the same. Erode peoples faith in the system = profit.
 

Comer suggests impeachment vote not ‘best path’ on Biden probe

House Oversight Chair James Comer (R-Ky.) suggested that the impeachment vote against President Biden may not be the “best path,” and thinks criminal referrals will be the way to go.

“I believe that the best path to accountability is criminal referrals,” Comer told Newsmax hosts on Thursday.


The Oversight Committee on Wednesday held a hearing on the impeachment inquiry into Biden. Democrats pressured Republicans to identify the criminal conduct underlying their probe as doubts rise about the future of the investigation into the president’s business dealings.

Comer argued in the interview that “real accountability” for Biden now looks like “providing real criminal referrals to the Department of Justice” because the Democrat-controlled Senate would likely table any impeachment into Biden “like they’re gonna do with the Merrick Garland impeachment.”

“I would vote to impeach Joe Biden right now. The impeachment inquiry was meant to give us more tools to be able to gather more information to be able to win in court,” he said.

During the hearing, Democrats were quick to ask Comer and other GOP members to name the crime or misdemeanor that is the root of their investigation.


Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) questioned why the impeachment was proceeding if the GOP has “no charges.” She said she has “yet to hear” from Comer that Republicans are specifically charging Biden with anything, since he often referred to wrongdoing by the “Biden family.”

“I am not hearing the specific allegation by this committee. What is it? It is not here. And that is the problem. The story is when this committee knew they were working with falsified evidence? That is the story,” Ocasio-Cortez said during the hearing.

Even after the hearing, Comer insisted that “the Bidens” have committed crimes by selling “access to @POTUS.”

Comer posted online that “in the coming days” he will invite Biden to testify before the committee and “explain why his family received tens of millions of dollars from foreign companies with his assistance.”
 
Now the GOP other high profile Witness in this case is suing Fox News after his impeachment Testimony

Tony Bobulinski Sues Fox News’ Jessica Tarlov for Defamation


Tony Bobulinski, a former associate of Hunter Biden who recently testified against President Joe Biden in the GOP-led House impeachment inquiry, filed a defamation lawsuit against Fox News co-host Jessica Tarlov on Thursday.

The complaint, filed in the Southern District of New York, seeks $30 million in damages from the liberal pundit over comments she made on Fox News about Bobulinski and his legal representation. Stefan Passantino, a lawyer for Bobulinski, is also a plaintiff in the lawsuit.


Following Bobulinski’s public testimony in an impeachment hearing last week, Tarlov said during the March 20 broadcast of The Five that a Donald Trump-associated political action committee had paid Bobulinski’s legal fees. Tarlov, however, issued a clarification the following day after Bobulinski’s attorney Jesse Binnall demanded a retraction and apology.

“I would like to clarify a comment I made yesterday during our discussion of Tony Bobulinski’s appearance at the congressional hearing. During an exchange with my colleagues about the hearing I said that Mr. Bobulinski’s lawyers’ fees have been paid by a Trump SuperPAC as recent as January,” she said on March 21. “What was actually said during the hearing was that the law firm representing Mr. Bobulinski was paid by a Trump PAC. I have seen no indication those payments were made in connection with Mr. Bobulinski’s legal fees and he denies that they were.”


Bobulinski, however, was unsatisfied with Tarlov’s remarks and sent Fox News another threatening letter the following day, adding that legal actions would be taken if his demands were not met.

“To be clear, we demand a complete retraction and apology by Ms. Tarlov AT THE TOP OF TODAY’S SHOW while showing this photograph in which Ms. Tarlov clearly states that she explicitly ‘apologizes to Tony Bobulinski and Stefan Passantino for making a false claim on the air which harmed their reputations.’ Ms. Tarlov must further state, ‘To be clear, it appears that Mr. Bobulinski has always paid all of his legal bills and there is no evidence that Mr. Passantino or his law firm accepted money from anyone other than Mr. Bobulinski for his representation.” These statements must be made without the petulant innuendo or further attempted mental gymnastics as we saw from her yesterday,” that letter read. “Absent such statements, both he and Mr. Passantino will continue to be harmed.”


Tarlov, meanwhile, did not issue the requested apology and retraction. Additionally, Fox News lawyers responded by noting that Tarlov’s “correction was accurate, and we will not be issuing any further correction.” Adding that Tarlov had “made clear that she had ‘no indication’ that there was any such connection between a Trump PAC and Mr. Bobulinski’s fees,” Fox lawyers repeated Bobulinski’s denial and reiterated that the network “will not issue any further correction.”

The network reiterated its position in a statement Thursday.

“Jessica Tarlov’s March 21st statements were accurate and made clear that she was not aware of anything to indicate that payments from a Trump PAC to Elections, LLC were made in connection with Tony Bobulinski’s legal fees,” a Fox News spokesperson told The Daily Beast. “We stand by our decision to not issue any further corrections and will vigorously defend against these inaccurate claims.”


Essentially repeating the claims made in the first two retraction demands to Fox News, the lawsuit accuses Tarlov of “deliberately and maliciously” defaming Bobulinski in an attempt to discredit his testimony before the House.

“Ms. Tarlov was aware at the time she made them that these false statements invoking President Trump would inflame a segment of the country against Mr. Bobulinski and Mr. Passantino and would falsely cause her viewers to disbelieve Mr. Bobulinski’s sworn testimony,” the complaint alleges. “As a Democratic strategist, and consistent with a well-established pattern of hostile and malicious intent to defame the character and reputation of anyone associated with President Trump, such as Mr. Passantino, and anyone who dared speak up against the Biden family.”

The lawsuit also cites Tarlov’s March 20 retweet of a Daily Beast article about a Trump PAC burning through donors’ money to cover the ex-president’s legal fees, claiming it was “exemplary of her awareness and pattern of hostile and malicious intent against Plaintiffs.”


While the complaint accuses Tarlov of three counts of defamation, the lawsuit notably does not name Fox News as a defendant but just The Five co-host individually.

In a statement through a spokesperson, Bobulinki said the following:

“Today I filed a lawsuit against Ms. Jessica Tarlov of Fox News for defamation. Although I am seeking compensatory, special, and punitive damages from her for the damage her public remarks inflicted on my personal and professional reputation, this is not about money. This is about the truth, for which I have been fighting for four years. It is important for media personalities like Ms. Tarlov to understand that lies have consequences. I have consistently told the truth to the American people about the deep corruption of the Biden family and will continue to do, and I have paid my legal expenses arising from my decision to come forward out of my own pocket. I will donate every penny I may be awarded in this suit to a children’s hospital and to support our military Veterans. Ms. Tarlov refused to apologize and sincerely correct the record. I look forward to holding her accountable in a court of law and to continuing to bring the truth to the American people.”
 

GOP Rep. Bacon Admits ‘No Evidence' of Crimes Found in Biden Impeachment Probe​


The impeachment probe against President Joe Biden is "probably nearing the conclusion," said Republican Rep. Don Bacon. The congressman said that lawyers for the committees investigating Biden "say, at this point, there's not a specific crime that has been committed."


"The lawyers and the committee that I talk to say there's not a specific crime," Bacon said during a Sunday appearance on NBC's Meet the Press. "And he'd need that for high crime or misdemeanor."

"I think it merited an investigation to put the facts out, let the public look at it, make a determination," he added. "And I think it's good to be transparent, especially in an election year, so let's put the facts on the table. But when I talked to the lawyers on the committee staff, they say, at this point, there is not a specific crime that's been committed. And I think that's important."


When host Kristen Welker asked the congressman if now is the time to "drop" the investigation, he said, "I don't know if it's time, right now. But I do think we're probably nearing the conclusion of this investigation."

Democrats have criticized the GOP-led investigation into the Bidens' finances, with Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez calling one recent impeachment hearing "a deep sea fishing expedition because the Republican case has completely fallen apart."

Hunter Biden in his testimony to the House Oversight Committee called the probe a "house of cards of lies" and a "destructive political charade."

Earlier this month, Alexander Smirnov, a key witness in the investigation, was charged with lying to federal authorities and admitted that Russian intelligence was "involved in passing a story" about the president's son.
 
Back
Top