US continues to go backward...

I doubt Musk did it to attract new advertisers. Jones can't even find advertisers for his own show, so he has to sell snake oil. Maybe Jones will inspire Musk to sell snake oil of his own. Perish the thought.

I think Jones makes stuff up and too often greatly embellishes and sensationalizes the truth when it isn't crazy enough for him. What it does to himself drives him madly paranoid. The guests Jones interviews have no credibility. His central Texas friend, Mike Adams, who has been referred to as the quack's quack, engages in a similar act. If Jones runs out of money and has to go away, Adams will only become better known as a result.
Jones is a lying conspiracy-theory idiot. Anyone who falls for his disturbing statements has only themselves to blame.

Twitter, like a lot of media, is full of disinformation. Twitter was that way prior to Elon and, even with a more even-handed community notes, still that way.
 
Like it not, a number of people don't seem to mind destroying their credibility by associating with Alex Jones. Just today, 12/10, Jones interviewed Elon Musk to celebrate being allowed back on X. Maybe Musk didn't have much credibility coming in to lose.
 
Last edited:
It didn't seem to indicate if Missouri women who go out of state could be charged with murder when returning. Probably some Oklahoma Republicans are anxious to submit a similar bill. It's quite a war on women, and women who vote for such Republicans are complicit to it.
 
have been seeing this on twitter/X and facebook the last few days, had to check it out...conclusion: Americans are very gullible...


Arizona GOP Candidate Says Migrants Given $5000 Gift Cards newsweek

Mark Lamb, an Arizona sheriff who running for the U.S. Senate as a Republican, said he had learned that migrants crossing the border illegally were being given $5,000 prepaid Visa cards

Federal agencies denied knowledge of such a scheme and Lamb offered no evidence to support his claim on X, formerly known as Twitter.

He also did not say how widespread the alleged practice was. A $5,000 payment to each family crossing the border would cost many millions of dollars a day, a program of a scale that large would be difficult to keep under the radar.

Mark, the Pinal County Sheriff, made the claim this week in a video shared to his Senate campaign account on X. Lamb claimed that "our government" was handing the migrants gift cards, cell phones and airline tickets to any domestic destination after entering the country.

"When these folks come across and they're processed, they're being given a cell phone, a plane ticket to anywhere they want to go in this country—so, probably to a community near you—and a $5,000 Visa card," Lamb says in the video.
While the U.S. government does offer funding support to some charities and other non-governmental organizations that aid migrants, it is not clear that any of the organizations are issuing those crossing the U.S.-Mexico border with $5,000 gift cards.
Some migrants are given a mobile phone after entering the country, with the purpose of tracking the migrants with pre-loaded software called SmartLink. The free phones cannot be used to access the internet or make unauthorized calls or text messages.

Lamb is seeking the Republican nomination to replace Arizona's Democrat-turned-independent Senator Kyrsten Sinema. His chief Republican rival in the race is former Arizona gubernatorial candidate Kari Lake, while Democratic U.S. Representative Ruben Gallego has also declared his candidacy.

Like Lake, Lamb is a staunch supporter of former President Donald Trump's false claims that the 2020 presidential election was "stolen" by massive voter fraud. He has been dubbed the "QAnon Sheriff" by some, referring to the far-right conspiracy theory that claims Trump is fighting a secret war against blood-drinking Democrats.



"So, while this Christmas season you're struggling to keep your lights on, while you're struggling to pay your rent, put Christmas presents under the tree for your kids, we have our government giving people who came into this country illegally $5,000 gift cards," he added. "That's the truth, folks."
There does not appear to be any U.S. government program that gives undocumented migrants $5,000 gift cards. A spokesperson for U.S. Customs and Border Protection told Newsweek via phone on Thursday that no gift cards came from the agency.
 
Good morning. We’re covering the rise in U.S. traffic deaths

11themorning-nl-1-plhz-jumbo-v2.jpg
Karsten Moran for The New York Times​

Outlier status​

For most of the automobile’s first century of existence, it became safer.

In the 1920s, the death toll from vehicle crashes was so high that gruesome photos of accidents were a staple of newspaper coverage. By 2010 — thanks to better design of roads and vehicles, the addition of seatbelts and greater awareness of drunken driving, among other things — the death rate from crashes had fallen almost 90 percent from its 1920s level.

oakImage-1702214852245-jumbo.png
By The New York Times | Source: National Safety Council​
But the progress ended about a decade ago, or at least it did in the United States. Even as vehicle deaths have continued falling in most counties, they have risen in this country.

Here’s a stark way of thinking about the problem: If the U.S. had made as much progress reducing vehicle crashes as other high-income countries had over the past two decades, about 25,000 fewer Americans would die every year.

oakImage-1702214892119-jumbo.png
By The New York Times | Source: OECD​
My colleagues Emily Badger, Ben Blatt and Josh Katz have published a story this morning that tries to solve one part of the mystery of this country’s outlier status. Emily, Ben and Josh focus on a specific part of the problem: Pedestrian deaths have surged at night.

The smartphone​

Many of the potential explanations for the trend don’t seem to fit. Cars in this country are large, but they have become only slightly larger since the early 2000s. Drunken driving has not become more common, and roads have not become more dangerous.

But there has been one major change in driver behavior: the use of smartphones.

“Smartphones have become ubiquitous with remarkable speed, overlapping closely with the timeline of rising pedestrian deaths,” Emily, Ben and Josh write. “Apple’s iPhone was introduced in 2007. Within a few years, one-third of American adults said they owned a smartphone.”

Smartphones have also become ubiquitous in other countries, of course. But American drivers seem to be addicted to their phones in ways that drivers elsewhere are not. Surveys suggest Americans spend more time on their phones while driving than people do in other countries. In part, this phenomenon may reflect this country’s culture, which emphasizes professional success and immediate gratification.

It also partly reflects vehicle technology. Nearly all cars in the U.S. are automatic transmission, freeing drivers’ hands (or so they may think) to use phones. In Europe, almost 75 percent of cars still have gears that a driver must change manually.

“The adoption of smartphones for the past 15 years — where we are today, being addicted on social media and other apps — absolutely contributes to the increase in fatalities on our roads,” Matt Fiorentino, a vice president at Cambridge Mobile Telematics, which tracks dangerous driving for carmakers, insurers and regulators, told Emily.

11themorning-nl-2-tzvm-jumbo-v2.jpg
Karsten Moran for The New York Times​

Pot and sidewalks, too​

Smartphones aren’t the only likely cause of the trend, Emily, Ben and Josh write. The spread of legal marijuana may also play a role, as may the rise in opioid addiction. In one recent federal study, half of the drivers involved in serious accidents tested positive for at least one active drug.

The continued growth of the population in the Sun Belt, where roads often lack sidewalks, crosswalks and bike lanes, may also be a factor, as may the recent increase in homelessness. People living on the streets are especially vulnerable to being hit by a car.

Some of these problems are difficult to solve. For others, however, there are promising solutions that state and local governments have simply chosen not to try. Building safe sidewalks, as Europe has done, is relatively cheap. Using traffic cameras to identify drivers who are texting — and imposing significant fines on them — would not be difficult, either.

Instead, the U.S. has chosen to accept a vehicle death rate that is almost three times higher than that of Canada, Australia or France, more than four times higher than that of Germany or Japan and more than five times higher than that of Scandinavia, Switzerland or Britain.

Among the recent victims of America’s uniquely high vehicle-death toll: A woman died after being hit by a vehicle while crossing a street in east Las Vegason Friday and then being hit by a second car while she was on the ground. A person in Redmond, Wash., died on Wednesday night after being struck by a driver in a gray Nissan Pathfinder who then fled the scene. Another pedestrian died in a hit-and-run accident in Colorado Springs on Friday.

And on Thursday night, mourners gathered at a ShopRite parking lot in Stamford, Conn., to remember Marie Jean-Charles, a 74-year-old cashier who had worked at the supermarket for 25 years. She was killed by a speeding driver while she was crossing the street to go to work.
 
Project Veritas CEO Jumps Ship After Finding ‘Evidence of Past Illegality’

Hannah Giles, the CEO of conservative nonprofit Project Veritas, announced her resignation “effective immediately” on Monday, saying she’d unwittingly “stepped into an unsalvageable mess” upon taking the job earlier this year. Giles was named the group’s chief executive four months after its messy breakup with founder James O’Keefe in February. In a statement posted to X, she claimed she’d taken over an organization “wrought with strong evidence of past illegality and past financial improprieties.” Suggesting she’d had no prior knowledge of the infamously embattled nonprofit’s alleged improprieties, Giles continued on to say that once she’d “discovered” the evidence, “I brought the information to the appropriate law enforcement agencies.” Project Veritas and O’Keefe are best known for using hidden cameras to embarrass journalists and political opponents. In 2009, O’Keefe and Giles, then a journalism student, teamed up to surreptitiously record members of the national community organizing group ACORN, resulting in its eventual shutdown. This September, Mediaite reported that Project Veritas had suspended all operations and fired most of its staffers.
 

Straight up ripped off the first 3 paragraphs from her Dem Colleague.​

Elise Stefanik Accused of Plagiarizing Letter by Democratic Colleague Mere Hours After She Denounced ‘Plagiarist’ Harvard President​


Rep. Kathy Manning (D-NC) accused Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-NY) of plagiarizing one of her letters on Tuesday, just hours after Stefanik denounced Harvard University President Claudine Gay as “a plagiarist.”

After the embattled Harvard University professor was hit with accusations of plagiarism this week, Stefanik protested the college’s decision to stand with Gay.


“This is a moral failure of Harvard’s leadership and higher education leadership at the highest levels,” complained Stefanik. “And the only change they have made to their code of conduct, where they failed to condemn calls for genocide of the Jewish people, the only update to the code of conduct is to allow a plagiarist as the president of Harvard.”

Mere hours later, however, Stefanik was hit with her own accusation of plagiarism.

“Can anyone spot the difference between the first 3 paragraphs of these two letters…?” tweeted Manning. “One is my letter, and one is @RepStefanik plagiarizing my letter to try and get her 15 minutes of fame. Don’t take my word for it, see for yourself.”

Manning then shared photos of two letters which were almost word-for-word identical in the first three paragraphs.


The congresswoman continued:

I led this letter to the boards of Penn, Harvard, & MIT following last week’s Education and Workforce Committee hearing on campus antisemitism, urging policy evaluation and changes regarding university codes of conduct.
When I shared my letter with @RepStefanik to try to make this a bipartisan effort, she made it clear with her “edits” that she didn’t care about protecting Jewish students. All she cared about was calling for the resignation of university presidents to score political points.
The biggest difference between these two letters:
I am working to make real changes to university codes of conduct so Jewish students and faculty are protected from hate.
Rep. Stefanik is trying to get a soundbite & media hits.
Stefanik has not yet publicly responded to the accusation.

See a side by side comparison of the letters for yourself
 

Straight up ripped off the first 3 paragraphs from her Dem Colleague.​

Elise Stefanik Accused of Plagiarizing Letter by Democratic Colleague Mere Hours After She Denounced ‘Plagiarist’ Harvard President​


Rep. Kathy Manning (D-NC) accused Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-NY) of plagiarizing one of her letters on Tuesday, just hours after Stefanik denounced Harvard University President Claudine Gay as “a plagiarist.”

After the embattled Harvard University professor was hit with accusations of plagiarism this week, Stefanik protested the college’s decision to stand with Gay.


“This is a moral failure of Harvard’s leadership and higher education leadership at the highest levels,” complained Stefanik. “And the only change they have made to their code of conduct, where they failed to condemn calls for genocide of the Jewish people, the only update to the code of conduct is to allow a plagiarist as the president of Harvard.”

Mere hours later, however, Stefanik was hit with her own accusation of plagiarism.

“Can anyone spot the difference between the first 3 paragraphs of these two letters…?” tweeted Manning. “One is my letter, and one is @RepStefanik plagiarizing my letter to try and get her 15 minutes of fame. Don’t take my word for it, see for yourself.”

Manning then shared photos of two letters which were almost word-for-word identical in the first three paragraphs.


The congresswoman continued:


Stefanik has not yet publicly responded to the accusation.

See a side by side comparison of the letters for yourself
To be completely fair, they both probably took those paragraphs from a JDL, ADL, or Hillel International press release, report, or executive summary.
 
10 Yr old arrested and Sentenced to 3 months of Probation in Mississippi for Urinating in Public....despite in August the Chief of Police stating
“Several of our officers were recently involved in an incident that involved a ten-year-old juvenile. The officer’s decisions violated our written policy and went against our prior training on how to deal with these situations,”

Race played role in sentencing of Black child, 10, for urinating in public, lawyer says​


10-year-old Black child in Mississippi who urinated in public in August was sentenced Tuesday in youth court to three months' probation, a decision the child’s attorney says was influenced by race.

Quantavious Eason, who is in the third grade, was arrested by Senatobia police Aug. 10 after a police officer saw him relieving himself outside next to his mom’s car when the woman was inside an attorney’s office, according to family attorney Carlos Moore.

Given the circumstances, any child would have done the same thing, Moore said. He noted there was no public restroom at the attorney’s office.


child arrest (Courtesy Latonya Eason)

child arrest (Courtesy Latonya Eason)© Courtesy Latonya Eason

“He did what any reasonable person would do: he urinated next to the car behind the door — not exposing himself to anyone,” Moore said. “He would not have been arrested, prosecuted or sentenced if he was any other color, race, besides Black.”

Moore said he’s baffled that an arrest was made, that prosecutors then pursued the case and that a youth judge this week oversaw a sentence that included probation and requiring Quantavious to write a two-page report about Kobe Bryant.

Quantavious was charged in youth court with being a child in need of supervision, Moore said. The child is required to check in with a probation officer once a month for three months, Moore said.

“We are not going to appeal. He will not have a criminal record, this is probation. And he is a fan of Kobe Bryant, so he doesn’t mind writing the two-page report,” Moore said. “But, still, the principle of it — he should not have to do anything. He should be enjoying his Christmas holiday like the other kids.”

The child’s mother, Latonya Eason, said Wednesday that she’s not sure if her son’s skin color influenced his arrest and the decisions made by prosecutors and a judge in youth court. However, she said, her son has been mistreated every step of the way.


“My son is going through enough getting arrested and then for him having to see a probation officer and then write an essay, I don’t think it’s right or it’s fair,” she said. “The average child would use the bathroom outside … and probably some grown men that would do the same thing.”

Officials with Senatobia police and the city could not be reached for comment Wednesday. The youth prosecutor and youth judge who oversaw the case were also not reached.

In an August statement posted on police department's Facebook page, Senatobia Police Chief Richard Chandler appeared to comment on the child’s arrest.

“Several of our officers were recently involved in an incident that involved a ten-year-old juvenile. The officer’s decisions violated our written policy and went against our prior training on how to deal with these situations,” the statement said.

Chandler added that one of the officers was no longer employed at the department, the other would be disciplined and the department would have mandatory juvenile training "just as we do every year."

Eason said on the day of her son’s arrest that while officers chose not to handcuff him, he was put in a jail cell. She recalled the responding officer being close to letting the child go with a warning after speaking with her.


Eason said that the officer told her she “handled it like a mom, just make sure it doesn’t happen again." However, several more officers showed up, including a lieutenant, who ultimately made the decision that the child had to be arrested, she said.

She said the arrest has resulted in her son not trusting police officers and being scared of them.

Moore said he plans to file a federal lawsuit next month against the city of Senatobia and the arresting officer. The lawsuit will claim that during the arrest, the child’s rights were violated under the Fourth Amendment, which protects against unreasonable searches and seizures.

Eason said justice in her eyes would mean that no other child will have to go through something similar.

“I want to make sure this doesn’t happen again,” she said. “No matter the color or who you are, no child should have to go through that.”

Senatobia is about 40 miles south of Memphis, Tennessee.
 
Jones is a lying conspiracy-theory idiot. Anyone who falls for his disturbing statements has only themselves to blame.

Twitter, like a lot of media, is full of disinformation. Twitter was that way prior to Elon and, even with a more even-handed community notes, still that way.
You're so right on Jones. During his meeting with Musk, Jones brought up to Musk how he allowed Ukraine to use help from his Starlink to launch an attack on Russia. But Musk said he never did that. Ukraine did want his help but said the Ukrainian government is not his boss. He would have helped Ukraine if President asked him to but never did. Then yesterday Alex Jones boasted to a fellow conspiracy theory nut, that he interviewed Musk for over two hours and Musk always agreed with him. What a lie. Jones and his fellow idiots put out more BS than I have the time or interest to begin to keep up with. My main concern over it is that I'm afraid too many people take them seriously, rather than only for entertainment purposes.
 
@Stillwater TownieMy main concern over it is that I’m afraid too many people take them seriously, rather than only for entertainment purposes

Very fair. There is no doubt too many people are searching to find something to grasp onto, believe everything said from an extremist side they follow, or are just plain gullible. That said, unless he is inciting violence…I think Twitter is best being an open market place of ideas. Even stupid conspiracy-theory ones like Jones. And including when his views are disgusting and obviously false like Sandy Hook.
 
@Stillwater TownieMy main concern over it is that I’m afraid too many people take them seriously, rather than only for entertainment purposes

Very fair. There is no doubt too many people are searching to find something to grasp onto, believe everything said from an extremist side they follow, or are just plain gullible. That said, unless he is inciting violence…I think Twitter is best being an open market place of ideas. Even stupid conspiracy-theory ones like Jones. And including when his views are disgusting and obviously false like Sandy Hook.
So your concept of "Twitter is best being an open marketplace of ideas" has room for non-1st Amendment protected stuff like liable and fraud?

Is there anything other than "inciting violence" that you think shouldn't belong? Child porn for instance?

I am legitimately asking.....not assuming. I'm asking because of your "unless he is inciting violence" indicates to me that is the only situation in which Twitter wouldn't be "best being an open marketplace of ideas."
 
Last edited:
So your concept of "Twitter is best being an open marketplace of ideas" has room for non-1st Amendment protected stuff like liable and fraud?

Is there anything other than "inciting violence" that you think shouldn't belong? Child porn for instance?

I am legitimately asking.....not assuming. I'm asking because of your "unless he is inciting violence" indicates to me that is the only situation in which Twitter wouldn't be "best being an open marketplace of ideas."
If you took my comment to think it was supporting child porn on the platform, that says a lot about yourself. And clueless to understanding the child porn is violence and inherently harmful and destructive.
 
If you took my comment to think it was supporting child porn on the platform, that says a lot about yourself. And clueless to understanding the child porn is violence and inherently harmful and destructive.
I didn’t “take your comment” to mean anything.

I legitimately was asking for clarification….and the request for clarification involved much more than child porn. In fact, I specifically mentioned fraud and liable as well.

And I prosecute child pornographers. Have put many in prison. I’m absolutely certain that my understanding of the harm and destruction it causes is much broader and deeper than yours.

The fact that you immediately took my question as me taking your comment as supporting child porn on the platform says a lot about you as well.

It’s good to see your continued primary response to questions (instead of just answering the question) is to fashion a straw man that the questioner didn’t make and then insult the poster for the statement/argument they didn’t actually make.

It’s a completely intellectually dishonest and bankrupt rhetorical tactic that is your primary go to.

I was treating you seriously and respectfully.

No need to do that again.

Thanks for reminding me of that fact.

Carry on.
 
I didn’t “take your comment” to mean anything.

I legitimately was asking for clarification….and the request for clarification involved much more than child porn. In fact, I specifically mentioned fraud and liable as well.

And I prosecute child pornographers. Have put many in prison. I’m absolutely certain that my understanding of the harm and destruction it causes is much broader and deeper than yours.

The fact that you immediately took my question as me taking your comment as supporting child porn on the platform says a lot about you as well.

It’s good to see your continued primary response to questions (instead of just answering the question) is to fashion a straw man that the questioner didn’t make and then insult the poster for the statement/argument they didn’t actually make.

It’s a completely intellectually dishonest and bankrupt rhetorical tactic that is your primary go to.

I was treating you seriously and respectfully.

No need to do that again.

Thanks for reminding me of that fact.

Carry on.
You admonishing others for insults. Lol. You remain consistent. And that’s not a good thing.

Interesting flex on knowing more about child porn harm.
 
Back
Top