US continues to go backward...

[JTOSU]

$1000 bucks for you to show me where I said spending wasn't a problem.
$500 bucks to me if I can show you where I said it was.

2:1 odds. You got to take that one, right????

Kudos, for you following my idea with challenge to take up with a bet. I appreciate that.

But I did that challenge twice to you previously and you ignored me both times. I even offered OSU NIL $$$. Still hurts - maybe we could have kept Justin Kirkland.

 

[Rob B.]

Kudos, for you following my idea with challenge to take up with a bet. I appreciate that.

But I did that challenge twice to you previously and you ignored me both times. I even offered OSU NIL $$$. Still hurts - maybe we could have kept Justin Kirkland.

Daaannng, I was giving him credit for an awesome reply.

 

[steross]

Kudos, for you following my idea with challenge to take up with a bet. I appreciate that.

But I did that challenge twice to you previously and you ignored me both times. I even offered OSU NIL $$$. Still hurts - maybe we could have kept Justin Kirkland.

Meh, I think Kirkland was kinda average.

I did not ignore you. I told you exactly what you were told today. You are a disingenuous poster, so I knew you would just weasel out of the bet. Heck, you weasel out of the simply saying "yea, I see your point, and I wasn't correct" all the time with NO money on the line. Not once have I seen that from you on this board.

@Rob B. may not always agree with me, but he is a stand-up dude. He ain't dumb enough to take that bet. But if he was drunk and did, he wouldn't weasel out like you would.

And, I've been on this, or the other board, since 2004. LOL, at the arrogance of you think betting is your "idea" around here. In fact, I paid up a bet to charity on the old board. That was with a poster who was trustworthy, and I was wrong.

 

[Stillwaterman]

Meh, I think Kirkland was kinda average.

Thats what I've been saying this whole time.

 

[JTOSU]

Meh, I think Kirkland was kinda average.

I did not ignore you. I told you exactly what you were told today. You are a disingenuous poster, so I knew you would just weasel out of the bet. Heck, you weasel out of the simply saying "yea, I see your point, and I wasn't correct" all the time with NO money on the line. Not once have I seen that from you on this board.

@Rob B. may not always agree with me, but he is a stand-up dude. He ain't dumb enough to take that bet. But if he was drunk and did, he wouldn't weasel out like you would.

And, I've been on this, or the other board, since 2004. LOL, at the arrogance of you think betting is your "idea" around here. In fact, I paid up a bet to charity on the old board. That was with a poster who was trustworthy, and I was wrong.

View attachment 11296

Kudos for paying your bet, I guess? I would hope you would pay a fun wager.
But let’s be real, you know both of my previous bets/challlenges were because you claimed I posted something I didn’t. Now that sounds disingenuous.

Although I do agree with you about Kirkland. He was, however, an All-American with the Gundy slow jog off/on the field after an opponent substitute.

 

[steross]

Kudos for paying your bet, I guess? I would hope you would pay a fun wager.
But let’s be real, you know both of my previous bets/challlenges were because you claimed I posted something I didn’t. Now that sounds disingenuous.

100% false. But, you will be you.

You vocally supported a large tax cut that did not have concomitant spending decreases, so increased the deficit.

Your claim is that you don't support tax cuts without spending decreases because you would have supported a spending decrease if it had happened. My statement is that by supporting what happened, you are supporting tax cuts without spending decreases.

Everyone knew that was what you did. And, everyone knows you would weasel out of the bet. You built your rep around here, not me.