I'd guess saying he is functioning at the intellectual level of an 8th grader at this point would be being generous.

Good speaker …so I understand why progressives like him and why GOP is concerned. But he sounds like a younger version of Bernie.![]()
1.4M views · 80K reactions | A young man at our town hall asked if I was pushing class warfare. I told him: “We already have class warfare in this country — billionaires are waging war on the rest of us.” | James Talarico
A young man at our town hall asked if I was pushing class warfare. I told him: “We already have class warfare in this country — billionaires are waging war on the rest of us.”www.facebook.com
Yeah..not so sure that a little Bernie isn't what is needed right nowGood speaker …so I understand why progressives like him and why GOP is concerned. But he sounds like a younger version of Bernie.
I agree that there are people that support Bernie, but, at least according to this study released today, the number of those people open to his class warfare rhetoric may be shrinking.. And… for Talarico will that work statewide in Texas?Yeah..not so sure that a little Bernie isn't what is needed right now
America’s wealthiest billionaires got $698 billion richer this year—and Trump's tax policy could give them a new windfall | Fortune https://share.google/m8dR3IFCtV5mZqtpO
Billionaire fortunes have reached all-time highs under Trump. So has the movement to tax them
Residents in at least 10 states are organizing campaigns to tax wealth in order to fund schools and other social services
![]()
Billionaire fortunes have reached all-time highs under Trump. So has the movement to tax them
Residents in at least 10 states are organizing campaigns to tax wealth in order to fund schools and other social serviceswww.theguardian.com
Donald Trump’s second administration has appointed an unprecedented number of wealthy individuals, with roughly 13 or more billionaires filling Cabinet-level positions, key agencies, and advisory roles. Led by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, these appointees include major donors, investors, and business leaders with a combined net worth surpassing $460 billion, highlighting an shift towards private-sector management.
Good Morning America
Good Morning America
+3
That same study also claims that the top 3.4% increased their wealth at a rate of 12x over 1979 while the middle class wealth increased at a rate of 3xI agree that there are people that support Bernie, but, at least according to this study released today, the number of those people open to his class warfare rhetoric may be shrinking.. And… will that work in Texas?
The issue is more people are moving into upper middle class and moving away from lower income.
“The U.S. middle class is shrinking, but not because more Americans are poorer. Instead, more households are climbing into the echelons of the upper middle class due to income gains in recent decades”
“About 31% of U.S. households earn enough to be considered upper middle class, a roughly threefold increase since 1979, making it the nation's largest economic group”
![]()
The upper middle class is now the largest income group in the U.S.
America's middle class is shrinking, but not because people are getting poorer. Instead, more households are climbing the ladder, new research suggests.www.yahoo.com
But by the time you're in your 60s and 70s and can finally afford to buy a mansion and luxury car, you wish you could be younger.I agree that there are people that support Bernie, but, at least according to this study released today, the number of those people open to his class warfare rhetoric may be shrinking.. And… for Talarico will that work statewide in Texas?
The issue is more people are moving into upper middle class and moving away from lower income.
“The U.S. middle class is shrinking, but not because more Americans are poorer. Instead, more households are climbing into the echelons of the upper middle class due to income gains in recent decades”
“About 31% of U.S. households earn enough to be considered upper middle class, a roughly threefold increase since 1979, making it the nation's largest economic group”
![]()
The upper middle class is now the largest income group in the U.S.
America's middle class is shrinking, but not because people are getting poorer. Instead, more households are climbing the ladder, new research suggests.www.yahoo.com
Wishful thinnking that the people are shrinking in this desire. It is the same argument Trump made to get votes then do more of the problem that the people thought they were voting against. Remember the first Hillary debate?I agree that there are people that support Bernie, but, at least according to this study released today, the number of those people open to his class warfare rhetoric may be shrinking.. And… for Talarico will that work statewide in Texas?
The issue is more people are moving into upper middle class and moving away from lower income.
“The U.S. middle class is shrinking, but not because more Americans are poorer. Instead, more households are climbing into the echelons of the upper middle class due to income gains in recent decades”
“About 31% of U.S. households earn enough to be considered upper middle class, a roughly threefold increase since 1979, making it the nation's largest economic group”
![]()
The upper middle class is now the largest income group in the U.S.
America's middle class is shrinking, but not because people are getting poorer. Instead, more households are climbing the ladder, new research suggests.www.yahoo.com
Yes, families are better off not only compared to 1979, but also 2000.Wishful thinnking that the people are shrinking. It is the same argument Trump made together votes then do more of the problem that the people thought they were voting against. Remember the first Hillary debate?
Your article massages the numbers in a way to show that people are better off than 1979 (well, I would hope TF so) by taking away any comparions of class today in the economic environment we live in. They also took the decrease in fertility (I can't afford kids!) and turned that into an eonomic gain (hey, let's makie up an arbitrary factor for family size and call you wealthiler if you have a smaller family.
The problem with comparing to the past instead of the current, is that is when you go to buy a house, you are not bidding against the single earner with 5 kids from 1979. Yes, the relative wealth of the nation has increased, and it has been maldistributed in a way that even the people making good incomes feel they are not able to keep up with Blackrock as their next door neighbor.
In contrast, rather than define middle-class thresholds relative to median income.....
Our analyses rely on absolute thresholds.