Texas sues to block rule protecting privacy for women who travel out of state to get abortions

Polds4OSU

Marshall
THEY WANT TO TRACK WOMEN WHO LEAVE THE STATE TO GET A LEGAL ABORTION IN A DIFFERENT STATE.

This is NOT A CONSERVATIVE OR SMALL GOVERNMENT PRINCIPLE !!!



(Reuters) - Texas sued the Biden administration in an effort to block a new rule that seeks to protect the privacy of women living in states that ban abortion who travel out of state for the procedure.

In a lawsuit filed on Wednesday in Lubbock, Texas, the state is asking a federal judge to strike down the rule, which prohibits healthcare providers and insurers from giving state law enforcement authorities information about reproductive healthcare that is legal where it was provided.


President Joe Biden, a Democrat, said in announcing the rule in April that no one should have their medical records "used against them, their doctor, or their loved one just because they sought or received lawful reproductive health care."

The measure came in response to efforts by authorities in some Republican-led states that ban abortion, including Texas, to restrict out-of-state travel for abortion. So far, no criminal prosecutions or civil judgments have resulted from those efforts.

Providers and insurers must fully comply with the new rule by December.

Texas is also asking the court to block a separate rule issued in 2000, which said healthcare providers and insurers can only hand over information if it is relevant to a legitimate law enforcement inquiry and is limited in scope.

Texas said in its lawsuit that providers frequently cite the 2000 rule as a reason for not responding to subpoenas from state investigators, and have begun invoking the new rule as well.


Both rules were issued by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), the federal law on patient privacy. Texas claims that HHS went beyond its authority under HIPAA in passing both rules, because the law preserves states' authority to conduct investigations.

"This new rule actively undermines Congress's clear statutory meaning when HIPAA was passed, and it reflects the Biden administration's disrespect for the law," Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton said in a statement.

HHS declined to comment directly on the lawsuit but said in a statement that the rule "stands on its own – women should be able to access legal reproductive health care without their medical records being used to track them or their doctors for liability."

The case has been assigned to U.S. District Judge James Wesley Hendrix, an appointee of Republican former President Donald Trump who has often ruled against Biden's policies. The administration has in the past accused Texas of "judge shopping" by bringing cases in small cities like Lubbock, where local rules assign most cases to Trump appointees.


Texas is one of more than 20 Republican-led states that have banned or restricted abortion since the U.S. Supreme Court's 2022 decision eliminating the longstanding nationwide right to abortion.
 
THEY WANT TO TRACK WOMEN WHO LEAVE THE STATE TO GET A LEGAL ABORTION IN A DIFFERENT STATE.

This is NOT A CONSERVATIVE OR SMALL GOVERNMENT PRINCIPLE !!!



(Reuters) - Texas sued the Biden administration in an effort to block a new rule that seeks to protect the privacy of women living in states that ban abortion who travel out of state for the procedure.

In a lawsuit filed on Wednesday in Lubbock, Texas, the state is asking a federal judge to strike down the rule, which prohibits healthcare providers and insurers from giving state law enforcement authorities information about reproductive healthcare that is legal where it was provided.


President Joe Biden, a Democrat, said in announcing the rule in April that no one should have their medical records "used against them, their doctor, or their loved one just because they sought or received lawful reproductive health care."

The measure came in response to efforts by authorities in some Republican-led states that ban abortion, including Texas, to restrict out-of-state travel for abortion. So far, no criminal prosecutions or civil judgments have resulted from those efforts.

Providers and insurers must fully comply with the new rule by December.

Texas is also asking the court to block a separate rule issued in 2000, which said healthcare providers and insurers can only hand over information if it is relevant to a legitimate law enforcement inquiry and is limited in scope.

Texas said in its lawsuit that providers frequently cite the 2000 rule as a reason for not responding to subpoenas from state investigators, and have begun invoking the new rule as well.


Both rules were issued by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), the federal law on patient privacy. Texas claims that HHS went beyond its authority under HIPAA in passing both rules, because the law preserves states' authority to conduct investigations.

"This new rule actively undermines Congress's clear statutory meaning when HIPAA was passed, and it reflects the Biden administration's disrespect for the law," Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton said in a statement.

HHS declined to comment directly on the lawsuit but said in a statement that the rule "stands on its own – women should be able to access legal reproductive health care without their medical records being used to track them or their doctors for liability."

The case has been assigned to U.S. District Judge James Wesley Hendrix, an appointee of Republican former President Donald Trump who has often ruled against Biden's policies. The administration has in the past accused Texas of "judge shopping" by bringing cases in small cities like Lubbock, where local rules assign most cases to Trump appointees.


Texas is one of more than 20 Republican-led states that have banned or restricted abortion since the U.S. Supreme Court's 2022 decision eliminating the longstanding nationwide right to abortion.
What a crazy slippery slope.

Go to Nevada and go to a brothel, get arrested when get back home.

Go to Colorado, smoke some weed, get arrested when you get back home.

Oh, wait, that won’t happen. Those laws could affect men.
 
What a crazy slippery slope.

Go to Nevada and go to a brothel, get arrested when get back home.

Go to Colorado, smoke some weed, get arrested when you get back home.

Oh, wait, that won’t happen. Those laws could affect men.
Pretty soon its going to be a requirement for at first OB appointment after the ultrasound to confirm pregnancy comes a mandatory ankle monitor.
 
THEY WANT TO TRACK WOMEN WHO LEAVE THE STATE TO GET A LEGAL ABORTION IN A DIFFERENT STATE.

This is NOT A CONSERVATIVE OR SMALL GOVERNMENT PRINCIPLE !!!



(Reuters) - Texas sued the Biden administration in an effort to block a new rule that seeks to protect the privacy of women living in states that ban abortion who travel out of state for the procedure.

In a lawsuit filed on Wednesday in Lubbock, Texas, the state is asking a federal judge to strike down the rule, which prohibits healthcare providers and insurers from giving state law enforcement authorities information about reproductive healthcare that is legal where it was provided.


President Joe Biden, a Democrat, said in announcing the rule in April that no one should have their medical records "used against them, their doctor, or their loved one just because they sought or received lawful reproductive health care."

The measure came in response to efforts by authorities in some Republican-led states that ban abortion, including Texas, to restrict out-of-state travel for abortion. So far, no criminal prosecutions or civil judgments have resulted from those efforts.

Providers and insurers must fully comply with the new rule by December.

Texas is also asking the court to block a separate rule issued in 2000, which said healthcare providers and insurers can only hand over information if it is relevant to a legitimate law enforcement inquiry and is limited in scope.

Texas said in its lawsuit that providers frequently cite the 2000 rule as a reason for not responding to subpoenas from state investigators, and have begun invoking the new rule as well.


Both rules were issued by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), the federal law on patient privacy. Texas claims that HHS went beyond its authority under HIPAA in passing both rules, because the law preserves states' authority to conduct investigations.

"This new rule actively undermines Congress's clear statutory meaning when HIPAA was passed, and it reflects the Biden administration's disrespect for the law," Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton said in a statement.

HHS declined to comment directly on the lawsuit but said in a statement that the rule "stands on its own – women should be able to access legal reproductive health care without their medical records being used to track them or their doctors for liability."

The case has been assigned to U.S. District Judge James Wesley Hendrix, an appointee of Republican former President Donald Trump who has often ruled against Biden's policies. The administration has in the past accused Texas of "judge shopping" by bringing cases in small cities like Lubbock, where local rules assign most cases to Trump appointees.


Texas is one of more than 20 Republican-led states that have banned or restricted abortion since the U.S. Supreme Court's 2022 decision eliminating the longstanding nationwide right to abortion.
Don't state laws only apply to things happening in the state? How can they prosecute any "crimes" that don't happen in their state? Don't see how any of this is legal.
 
What a crazy slippery slope.

Go to Nevada and go to a brothel, get arrested when get back home.

Go to Colorado, smoke some weed, get arrested when you get back home.

Oh, wait, that won’t happen. Those laws could affect men.
We were told by some around here that the overturning of RvW isn't that big of a deal because women can always just go to another state to get their abortion.

So much for that.
 
Don't state laws only apply to things happening in the state? How can they prosecute any "crimes" that don't happen in their state? Don't see how any of this is legal.
To please their far-right Christian donors, Republicans could make a law allowing murder charges to be filed against Texas women who get abortions legally in other states. And then hope a court doesn't overrule it. Anyway, I hope this unjust insanity makes more people vote against Republicans in Texas and elsewhere.

I don't know of any place in the bible where a woman who got an abortion was charged with murder. The most pro-life people in the world aren't Republicans who want all abortion banned. Instead, the most pro-life people are women who are joyfully pregnant. Republicans should focus on them getting excellent prenatal care to reduce maternal and infant mortality.
 
Last edited:
To please their far-right Christian donors, Republicans could make a law allowing murder charges to be filed against Texas women who get abortions legally in other states. And then hope a court doesn't overrule it. Anyway, I hope this unjust insanity makes more people vote against Republicans in Texas and elsewhere.
Trump's lead is only 4 or 5% in Texas right now. If the San Antonio voter registration pushes don't get stopped they can make up some ground and make it close.
 
To please their far-right Christian donors, Republicans could make a law allowing murder charges to be filed against Texas women who get abortions legally in other states. And then hope a court doesn't overrule it. Anyway, I hope this unjust insanity makes more people vote against Republicans in Texas and elsewhere.

I don't know of any place in the bible where a woman who got an abortion was charged with murder. The most pro-life people in the world aren't Republicans who want all abortion banned. Instead, the most pro-life people are women who are joyfully pregnant. Republicans should focus on them getting excellent prenatal care to reduce maternal and infant mortality.
the Jewish Holy Scriptures actually state the soul of the body doesn't enter the body until the first breath.

Jewish Faith has NEVER seen Abortion as illegal as they have always considered a fetus a part of the mother until that first breath. So not only are they repressing women's reproductive Freedoms and Medical Decision Making Freedoms they are ALSO SUPRESSING the belief systems of the Jewish Faith....thus suppressing the Freedom of Religion
 
Back
Top