How it started...How it's going thread

The Onion hads won in Court and now control Alex Jones old website infowars.com


And they posted a message from their fake Parent Company companies CEO about how they would use the website

But it won't happen until May 1. Alex Jones said they are going to be in big trouble for it and will file a whole bunch of actions against it. He admits, though, that Trump has openly joined forces with the Democrat Party to shut down Info Wars. It's beyond disgusting and absolutely blows him away.

Apparently the new logo for InfoWars:

HGYosh4bYAAiUKB.jpeg
 
Last edited:
But it won't happen until May 1. Alex Jones said they are going to be in big trouble for it and will file a whole bunch of actions against it. He admits, though, that Trump has openly joined forces with the Democrat Party to shut down Info Wars. It's beyond disgusting and absolutely blows him away.

Apparently the new logo for InfoWars:

View attachment 20302

Shirtless Alex Jones melts down after losing Infowars to The Onion​

link
Via The Daily Beast https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/s...1&cvid=69e8c8285c964494afab84e7cd47d76f&ei=34
 
Trump will whine about it, but states have a right to redistrict how they want.... and Texas started it. However, I do think the phrasing on the ballot was not only very confusing to voters not paying attention, but intentionally designed to muddle the issue.

"Should the Constitution of Virginia be amended to allow the General Assembly to temporarily adopt new congressional districts to restore fairness in the upcoming elections, while ensuring Virginia’s standard redistricting process resumes for all future redistricting after the 2030 census?"
 
Last edited:
Trump will whine about it, but states have a right to redistrict how they want.... and Texas started it. However, I do think the phrasing on the ballot was only very confusing to voters not paying attention, but intentionally designed to muddle the issue.

"Should the Constitution of Virginia be amended to allow the General Assembly to temporarily adopt new congressional districts to restore fairness in the upcoming elections, while ensuring Virginia’s standard redistricting process resumes for all future redistricting after the 2030 census?"
at least the public got to go to a voting booth, and use an actual ballot and actually vote on it.

The question just being on a ballot to begin with is more democratic than what many of the GOP controlled states are doing with this crap.
 

GOP already plotting response to Dem victory on Virginia Redistricting Voting Win.​

Tuesday night, Virginia voters approved a new congressional district map for the state that could flip as many as four Republican-controlled seats, a referendum that was launched in response to Trump’s redistricting push he pushedlast year to bolster Republicans’ election prospects for the upcoming midterm elections.

As Democrats’ victory became apparent Tuesday night, former White House spokesperson Harrison Fields, who served as Trump’s special assistant last year before resigning to join a conservative lobbying firm, pitched what he believed Republicans’ response should be: initiate redistricting in Florida to benefit Republicans.

“To my friends in Tallahassee: in a state that is ruby red, it’s time to respond to what we saw tonight in Virginia with a redistricting plan that reflects Florida’s true partisan lean – and adds 3-4 GOP seats to our supermajority,” Fields wrote in a social media post, tagging Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis and Republican figures.

“Virginia is a purple state being drawn as deep blue. Florida should draw a map that’s even redder – and get it passed ASAP.”

The proposal, however, has already sparked “concern” among Republicans, Politico reported, particularly given the recent off-year Democratic election victories in the state.

“Recent special elections in South Florida (including one in Palm Beach itself) offered up eye-catching Democratic wins and overperformances, raising fears among some Republicans that redistricting could backfire,” Politico reported.

“Even some of Trump’s closest allies in Florida are worried. MAGA influencer Laura Loomer – who famously has the president on speed dial – told [Politico] this month that with DeSantis moving forward with redistricting, ‘he’s going to take away from the strongholds.’”
 
Trump will whine about it, but states have a right to redistrict how they want.... and Texas started it. However, I do think the phrasing on the ballot was not only very confusing to voters not paying attention, but intentionally designed to muddle the issue.

"Should the Constitution of Virginia be amended to allow the General Assembly to temporarily adopt new congressional districts to restore fairness in the upcoming elections, while ensuring Virginia’s standard redistricting process resumes for all future redistricting after the 2030 census?"
I hear you but for most of the state this was the ONLY item on the ballot. It's not like people were going to vote and this just happened to be on the ballot. They knew this was it and was the only thing they were voting for. The maps had also been out since February.
 

Just add this to the list of "Republicans didn't think beyond their immediate 'win' " examples...
Normally stuff like this would disgust me and I would be saying that there needs to be adults in the room and just because the other side is bad doesn't mean you have to be.

But, MAGA has taken everything to such an extreme that this is a fight for the republic and stuff like this has to be on the table.
 
I hear you but for most of the state this was the ONLY item on the ballot. It's not like people were going to vote and this just happened to be on the ballot. They knew this was it and was the only thing they were voting for. The maps had also been out since February.
True, it was the only state-wide referendum on the ballot. But the language was intentionally designed to be confusing and to lead people to vote a certain way. I don't know what percentage of people knew about the ballot before voting, but it only would have taken .06% of people to be confused and the referendum would not have passed. I think it is safe to say that the phrasing probably confused at least .06% of the voters.

The phrasing also provides an avenue for the GOP to challenge the election in the courts.
 
True, it was the only state-wide referendum on the ballot. But the language was intentionally designed to be confusing and to lead people to vote a certain way. I don't know what percentage of people knew about the ballot before voting, but it only would have taken .06% of people to be confused and the referendum would not have passed. I think it is safe to say that the phrasing probably confused at least .06% of the voters.

The phrasing also provides an avenue for the GOP to challenge the election in the courts.
Will be interesting to argue that the other side was trying to confuse voters while trying to confuse voters.

 

Just add this to the list of "Republicans didn't think beyond their immediate 'win' " examples...

So the concern with Republicans is some of the "red" districts they created are maybe they cut a bit too thin. So it's going to be tough for them to create what basically turns into a purple district when they are looking at getting smoked in the next election.

Maybe instead of trying to rig Texas they should have pushed policies that have broader support.
 
Will be interesting to argue that the other side was trying to confuse voters while trying to confuse voters.

Yeah it will

Republican Dark Money Group Blankets Virginia With Deceptive Mailers Ahead of Redistricting Vote
Ads targeting Black voters compare Virginia’s redistricting referendum to Jim Crow.

Source: Democracy Docket https://share.google/vD5mB9AtfutbYK4vK

NAACP Virginia State Conference Confronts Jim Crow Disinformation in Redistricting Referendum Affecting Black Voters – NAACP Virginia https://share.google/svyTh6d0un1v381pE

These headlines are from end of March and beginning of April

I'm sure who will be sued will just say they were trying to phrase the question in a way to refute already existing misinformation that had already been spread across the state
 
True, it was the only state-wide referendum on the ballot. But the language was intentionally designed to be confusing and to lead people to vote a certain way. I don't know what percentage of people knew about the ballot before voting, but it only would have taken .06% of people to be confused and the referendum would not have passed. I think it is safe to say that the phrasing probably confused at least .06% of the voters.

The phrasing also provides an avenue for the GOP to challenge the election in the courts.
I honestly don´t see the confusion in the question...I suppose you can say that the words ´restore fairness´ could confuse voters; however, I would go the opposite side and say it would get more No votes or just as many No as Yes, because of all the Maga cries of how voting has been unfair, whenever I see a side whining about ´fair elections´ it is usually the GOP side saying it´s not fair...
 
Yeah it will

Republican Dark Money Group Blankets Virginia With Deceptive Mailers Ahead of Redistricting Vote
Ads targeting Black voters compare Virginia’s redistricting referendum to Jim Crow.

Source: Democracy Docket https://share.google/vD5mB9AtfutbYK4vK

NAACP Virginia State Conference Confronts Jim Crow Disinformation in Redistricting Referendum Affecting Black Voters – NAACP Virginia https://share.google/svyTh6d0un1v381pE

These headlines are from end of March and beginning of April

I'm sure who will be sued will just say they were trying to phrase the question in a way to refute already existing misinformation that had already been spread across the state

Im sure there was plenty of dark money floating around from both sides in this one.

I think about all the money spent on political campaigns and wonder how much better it could be put to use feeding the hungry or housing the homeless
 
Back
Top