This is the correct answer. Texass specifically built a new arena to have about 10,000 seating (for basketball, (and 16,000 for concerts). There are articles out there quoting the AD, etc., that they wanted to maximize their home court advantage, but they could have it larger for other events. We could easily do the same thing in GIA. Here's an excerpt from an article about their new arena from Forbes:
"That discussion led to a new way to partition off the large building. Working with a theatrical company, Gensler designed fabric-wrapped aluminum frames that fold into the ceilings and can hinge down and seal off the entire upper bowl of the arena. Instead of using blackout curtains, as is common in the industry, the new partitions block off the view of the 5,000-seat upper deck and make the space look and feel much smaller."
https://www.forbes.com/sites/timnew...sign-for-basketball-concerts/?sh=4d89672e5d3b
We could cut off the upper sections, or just some of the upper rows, in much the same way, I would think. Can't be some huge technical problem. Just takes some imagination and willingness to think outside the box.
We need to regain that home court advantage. Old Gallagher Hall held 6,381. Then GIA took it to 13,611. More than twice as large. Why not make it reducible to 10,000 or less. Heck, if enuf tickets are sold, easily resize it to 11 or 12 or 13 thousand with partitions similar to the ones UT uses. Makes sense.
Heck, Duke has wisely preserved their great home-court advantage with Cameron Indoor, which holds 9,314.
As Russell Westbrook used to say--and probably still does--why not?