jobob85
Bent Member
If you can't figure it out I can't help you.How is that any different? They didn’t just leave. They had to pay a settlement.
If you can't figure it out I can't help you.How is that any different? They didn’t just leave. They had to pay a settlement.
They didn’t have a choice
They made their deal in secret, there was transparency with the public. They are a public entity they aren’t a private business.How is that any different? They didn’t just leave. They had to pay a settlement.
They made their deal in secret, there was transparency with the public. They are a public entity they aren’t a private business.
Wrong answer amigo, their funds are state funds and they have to follow open records and open meeting. That’s why the outhouse on the prairie almost didn’t get its metal for part of their rebuild because of a question on if the admin followed the competitive bidding act. It’s just a matter of if concerned citizens want to request or sue for the records.D-1 athletic departments are for profit business masquerading as “public” and shielded by state law.
What they are is totally separate from the university budgetD-1 athletic departments are for profit business masquerading as “public” and shielded by state law.
They still function under the Regents. That’s like saying a HS fb program is separate from a school system b cause they have an activity fund.What they are is totally separate from the university budget
You are getting out there now. Look at what I postedThey still function under the Regents. That’s like saying a HS fb program is separate from a school system b cause they have an activity fund.
But they really aren’t, it’s more like they are a different fund under the budget. The regents for the university still control the purse strings.You are getting out there now. Look at what I posted
Wrong answer amigo, their funds are state funds and they have to follow open records and open meeting. That’s why the outhouse on the prairie almost didn’t get its metal for part of their rebuild because of a question on if the admin followed the competitive bidding act. It’s just a matter of if concerned citizens want to request or sue for the records.
Yes they do but its a separate thing.But they really aren’t, it’s more like they are a different fund under the budget. The regents for the university still control the purse strings.
Contracts can always be broken, but there is a price to pay, and often it's quite expensive to get out of. The big 12 stood to gain quite a lot of money by OU and texas leaving early. On top of moving two recruiting giants out of the conference, it was a good day for many big 12 teams.ou and texas left early. Contracts mean nothing anymore. We are already hearing rumblings about the top tier schools in conference wanting a larger portion of revenue. It is coming and will probably be counter productive until it gets figured out.
They announced their intent to leave, then negotiated. We both know they dont leave until July 1. They couldnt leave until a deal was negotiated and agreed uponNope they left and then negotiated their settlement.
That's the point, that's an example of contracts that have teethThey didn’t have a choice
DuhThat's the point, that's an example of contracts that have teeth
Thank god we’ve got captain obvious here to bloviate at length about things we’re all aware of.
They aren't shielded by State law.D-1 athletic departments are for profit business masquerading as “public” and shielded by state law.
No, it’s still public money.Yes they do but it’s a separate thing.
Never claimed it wasn'tNo, it’s still public money.
Ya, we already knew that though.