We. Out be thinking of different plays. Nobody was on him at all.We were also trapped in the back court
We. Out be thinking of different plays. Nobody was on him at all.We were also trapped in the back court
Oh maybe so.We. Out be thinking of different plays. Nobody was on him at all.
In fairness Garrison was at the scorer’s table waiting on a deadball. We went from the under 12 all the way to the under 8. I think Garrison went to the table at 11:30ish.Where is Garrison? The Cowboys are getting killed by their 7 footer and Boynton has Garrison in the bench.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
In fairness Garrison was at the scorer’s table waiting on a deadball. We went from the under 12 all the way to the under 8. I think Garrison went to the table at 11:30ish.
But your point is valid and why I think Boynton loses key pieces. I am still really high on Dailey but he is being handled wrong and developed incorrectly on both ends. Defensively he is being asked to guard the other team’s post. He is not ready for that. Offensively we stick him in the corner and run zero sets for him. No screens to get mismatches down low or touches going to the rim. He was really good from 15-20 feet early but Boynton doesn’t want midrange jumpers bc analytics. I think it was against Kst in GIA he took an 18’ and immediately came out.
I agree. Dailey hasn't developed at all in the last month or so, mainly because he hasn't had the chance to. HCMB sure doesn't mind when Bryce Thompson shoots mid range jumpers.In fairness Garrison was at the scorer’s table waiting on a deadball. We went from the under 12 all the way to the under 8. I think Garrison went to the table at 11:30ish.
But your point is valid and why I think Boynton loses key pieces. I am still really high on Dailey but he is being handled wrong and developed incorrectly on both ends. Defensively he is being asked to guard the other team’s post. He is not ready for that. Offensively we stick him in the corner and run zero sets for him. No screens to get mismatches down low or touches going to the rim. He was really good from 15-20 feet early but Boynton doesn’t want midrange jumpers bc analytics. I think it was against Kst in GIA he took an 18’ and immediately came out.
Like most others, I want Boynton gone, too. But he didn't say his players sucked. That's not even remotely close.I would have taken it personally. “I’d be a better coach if you a holes would buy me better players. These guys suck.”
Perfect paraphrase.
In fairness Garrison was at the scorer’s table waiting on a deadball. We went from the under 12 all the way to the under 8. I think Garrison went to the table at 11:30ish.
But your point is valid and why I think Boynton loses key pieces. I am still really high on Dailey but he is being handled wrong and developed incorrectly on both ends. Defensively he is being asked to guard the other team’s post. He is not ready for that. Offensively we stick him in the corner and run zero sets for him. No screens to get mismatches down low or touches going to the rim. He was really good from 15-20 feet early but Boynton doesn’t want midrange jumpers bc analytics. I think it was against Kst in GIA he took an 18’ and immediately came out.
Not even remotely close? Yeah, it was. Unless you’re HCMB you don’t know what the context was. If his intent should be “self evident,” he did a piss poor job conveying it.Like most others, I want Boynton gone, too. But he didn't say his players sucked. That's not even remotely close.
He meant that we lost experienced players due to the woefully underfunded basketball NIL program. We certainly would've had a much better season had NIL kept those players here. We wouldn't have to rely on one of the youngest (if not the youngest) rosters in all of collegiate basketball. We're in the toughest basketball conference... without experience, well, it's a recipe for disaster
'm not defending Boynton and his interview. I'm merely giving context to what Boynton meant... it should be self-evident to what he meant... not sure how people are interpreting incorrectly. Maybe because of how all upset we all are... I get it tho
He’s still wrongLike most others, I want Boynton gone, too. But he didn't say his players sucked. That's not even remotely close.
He meant that we lost experienced players due to the woefully underfunded basketball NIL program. We certainly would've had a much better season had NIL kept those players here. We wouldn't have to rely on one of the youngest (if not the youngest) rosters in all of collegiate basketball. We're in the toughest basketball conference... without experience, well, it's a recipe for disaster
'm not defending Boynton and his interview. I'm merely giving context to what Boynton meant... it should be self-evident to what he meant... not sure how people are interpreting incorrectly. Maybe because of how all upset we all are... I get it tho
Yep still wrong. NIL is a piss poor excuse for bad results. Does Iowa State have a deep well funded NIL program? Does Texas Tech? How about Colorado State, Utah State, Florida Atlantic, or Dayton? Nope. Sure don't. Yet all those teams have been mainstays or in/out of the top 25 all season despite the lack of NIL and top tier recruiting classes.He’s still wrong