My LDL is 62 and I've finally gotten my HDL over 40. It took 20 damn years to achieve that HDL.Well as someone with no known heart disease who has medicated myself down to an ApoB of 42, I can't much whine about this.
My LDL is 62 and I've finally gotten my HDL over 40. It took 20 damn years to achieve that HDL.Well as someone with no known heart disease who has medicated myself down to an ApoB of 42, I can't much whine about this.
I'd really like to see the actual words. Taken without context it sounds horrific. But, if meant only as a hyperbolic statement regarding antibiotic overuse which is a HUGE problem, then so what?
I did a study with my students in Ohio looking at visits for respiratory infections at a primary care clinic. 80% of them resulted in antibiotics even though the symptoms were most likely viral in the vast majority of cases.I'd really like to see the actual words. Taken without context it sounds horrific. But, if meant only as a hyperbolic statement regarding antibiotic overuse which is a HUGE problem, then so what?
People say all the time, "I'd have to be on my deathbed before I would blah, blah, blah" which isn't meant to be literal.
UHC is the worst.
My lipids
LDL< 70
HDL < 100
ApoB not done, but my Trigs < 150 si I bet ApoB is below target as well.
You can always increase again if you need to.I'm debating if I should back off my meds. My last LDL was 35 and since that was taken we have incorporated more fish and plant based proteins in our diet and cut back on meat some so it is likely lower. I realize RCTs have yet to find a "too low" but for primary prevention not sure if I really should be pushing it to there.