American Healthcare continues to go backward

I heard once again the death of pharmacy. I stopped listening at that point. I'm glad I'm close to retirement.
I don't blame you. Trump's irrational health care policy sounds too good to believe to be true. This is because Trump said many drug prices would be slashed by 300 to 500%. I'm not so poor that I need drug companies to pay me to use them. I'm not that greedy. But please just slash drug prices by 100%, so I can get them for free. The price for Paxlovid when you need it for COVID is hugely high with or without most deductibles!

As far as health insurance companies are concerned it will be interesting to see how hugely high the deductibles will be before they will offer something affordable. It doesn't seem to be clear if you are required to spend the money on health insurance the government sends you. If I was a young person in my 20s, I can see myself not doing that. I didn't buy health insurance then and didn't regret not doing that.

Just solve things by offering Medicare For All. But also, at the same time have it figured out how to fix the shortage in health care professionals. Nobody should have to wait two months or more to see a cardiologist. And then another two months before you can get an appointment to have tests done recommended by the cardiologist.
 
Last edited:
1 hr ago

HHS quickly reverses $2 billion in mental health and substance abuse cuts after pushback​


link
That was fast...
Never Mind Baby GIF
 
There is absolutely nothing about, around, within, or concerning CVS that works well for the consumer. Or their pharmacist employees. Or independent pharmacies, which they screw over every chance they get.

I was in my early 20's when the ACA was passed. Does it have a lot to do with what we're seeing today with PBM's, PE, administrative costs, etc?
It just feels like the last 15 years have seen profits and costs absolutely soar.
 
I was in my early 20's when the ACA was passed. Does it have a lot to do with what we're seeing today with PBM's, PE, administrative costs, etc?
It just feels like the last 15 years have seen profits and costs absolutely soar.
When you pour slop into the through you really can’t blame the pigs for lining up and feeding, can you?
 
Especially when the pigs were intimately involved in creating the slop delivery plan.

From The Guardian in 2012:

Obamacare architect leaves White House for pharmaceutical industry job

When the legislation that became known as "Obamacare" was first drafted, the key legislator was the Democratic Chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, Max Baucus, whose committee took the lead in drafting the legislation. As Baucus himself repeatedly boasted, the architect of that legislation was Elizabeth Fowler, his chief health policy counsel; indeed, as Marcy Wheeler discovered, it was Fowler who actually drafted it. As Politico put it at the time: "If you drew an organizational chart of major players in the Senate health care negotiations, Fowler would be the chief operating officer."

What was most amazing about all of that was that, before joining Baucus' office as the point person for the health care bill, Fowler was the Vice President for Public Policy and External Affairs (i.e. informal lobbying) at WellPoint, the nation's largest health insurance provider (before going to WellPoint, as well as after, Fowler had worked as Baucus' top health care aide). And when that health care bill was drafted, the person whom Fowler replaced as chief health counsel in Baucus' office, Michelle Easton, was lobbying for WellPoint as a principal at Tarplin, Downs, and Young.

Whatever one's views on Obamacare were and are: the bill's mandate that everyone purchase the products of the private health insurance industry, unaccompanied by any public alternative, was a huge gift to that industry; as Wheeler wrote at the time: "to the extent that Liz Fowler is the author of this document, we might as well consider WellPoint its author as well." Watch the five-minute Bill Moyers report from 2009, embedded below, on the key role played in all of this by Liz Fowler and the "revolving door" between the health insurance/lobbying industry and government officials at the time this bill was written and passed.

More amazingly still, when the Obama White House needed someone to oversee implementation of Obamacare after the bill passed, it chose . . . Liz Fowler. That the White House would put a former health insurance industry executive in charge of implementation of its new massive health care law was roundly condemned by good government groups as at least a violation of the "spirit" of governing ethics rules and even "gross", but those objections were, of course, brushed aside by the White House. She then became Special Assistant to the President for Healthcare and Economic Policy at the National Economic Council.

Now, as Politico's "Influence" column briefly noted on Tuesday, Fowler is once again passing through the deeply corrupting revolving door as she leaves the Obama administration to return to the loving and lucrative arms of the private health care industry:

"Elizabeth Fowler is leaving the White House for a senior-level position leading 'global health policy' at Johnson & Johnson's government affairs and policy group."

The pharmaceutical giant that just hired Fowler actively supported the passage of Obamacare through its membership in the Pharmaceutical Researchers and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA) lobby. Indeed, PhRMA was one of the most aggressive supporters - and most lavish beneficiaries - of the health care bill drafted by Fowler. Mother Jones' James Ridgeway proclaimed "Big Pharma" the "big winner" in the health care bill. And now, Fowler will receive ample rewards from that same industry as she peddles her influence in government and exploits her experience with its inner workings to work on that industry's behalf, all of which has been made perfectly legal by the same insular, Versailles-like Washington culture that so lavishly benefits from all of this.

It's difficult to find someone who embodies the sleazy, anti-democratic, corporatist revolving door that greases Washington as shamelessly and purely as Liz Fowler. One of the few competitors I can think of is Adm. Michael McConnell, who parlayed his military and intelligence career into a lucrative gig at Booz Allen, one of the nation's largest private intelligence contractors; then became George W Bush's Director of National Intelligence (where he spearheaded a huge gift to the telecom industry - retroactive immunity shielding it from all accountability for its participation in the illegal Bush NSA eavesdropping program - as well as continued his Booz Allen work of privatizing intelligence and surveillance functions); then returned to the loving arms of Booz Allen, where he now exploits his national security credentials on behalf of industry interests (by, for instance, spearheading the fear-mongering campaign about cyber-warfare in order to advocate for security programs that would amply enrich Booz Allen's clients).

This is precisely the behavior which, quite rationally, makes the citizenry so jaded about Washington. It's what ensures that the interests of the same permanent power factions are served regardless of election outcomes. It's what makes a complete mockery out of claims of democracy. And it's what demonstrates that corporatism and oligarchy are the dominant forms of government in the US.
 
Especially when the pigs were intimately involved in creating the slop delivery plan.
But of course. If I could create a law mandating that people buy my product I would do it in a heartbeat.

Who was the “big winner” when Medicare Part D was passed? Hint: it wasn’t independent pharmacies. Another hint: drug shortages were rare before Medicare Part D.

Who were the big winners when Medicare Parts A & B were passed? Hint: it wasn’t doctors, who were largely self-employed at the time and are now all employees of giant healthcare corporations.
 
Last edited:

Are measles outbreaks now a “cost of doing business” in the U.S.? Remarkably, that’s what a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) official said this week. Let’s hope his insouciance isn’t as contagious as the virus.

Measles is among the most contagious viruses. An infected person will transmit the virus on average to 18 others if those 18 haven’t been vaccinated or previously infected. There’s a real risk the U.S. could soon lose “measles elimination status,” which occurs when a country experiences continuing transmission for a year or longer.

Asked by the press this week if he’s worried about this, CDC principal deputy director Ralph Abraham—recently appointed by Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.—shrugged. “Not really,” he replied. “You know, it’s just the cost of doing business, with our borders being somewhat porous [and] global and international travel.”

Not really. Fewer than 2% of U.S. cases have been imported from abroad. But outbreaks happen when vaccination rates fall below the levels needed to maintain herd immunity, which is about 95%. The kindergarten vaccination rate in South Carolina was 91% during the 2024-2025 school year.

Outbreaks have increased because childhood immunizations have declined since the pandemic. In 2019 only three states had kindergarten measles vaccination rates below 90%. Sixteen did last year. A major culprit is a backlash to Covid vaccine mandates and government health officials who prevaricated and condescended to the public.

But Mr. Kennedy has fueled the vaccine distrust, even saying the vaccine causes disabilities and death like the virus. It doesn’t. In November the CDC updated a vaccine safety webpage to state that “The claim ‘vaccines do not cause autism’ is not an evidence-based claim because studies have not ruled out the possibility that infant vaccines cause autism. Studies supporting a link have been ignored by health authorities.

Like his boss, Dr. Abraham claims people should be “free” not to vaccinate children. “You know, the president, the [health] secretary, we talk all the time about religious freedom, health freedom, personal freedom, and I think we have to respect those communities that choose to go somewhat of a different route,” he said.

The problem with this line is that unvaccinated children can sicken infants and immuno-compromised children who can’t be inoculated, leaving some disabled or worse. In a better Administration, government leaders would explain this to parents rather than brush aside serious illness as inconsequential.
 
Back
Top