Recent content by CowboyJD

You know what I’m gonna say right now…… Right?

The relevant part of that headline is "in exit speech". I am fed up with these cowards "taking a stand" only after they abandon all power to do anything about it. Day late and a dollar short, in my book.

When I worked in the service industry (waiter, bartender, occasional cook), 86 meant a few things: An item on the menu was either sold out or taken off the menu for some reason. 86-ing a person meant: 1) You were cutting him off from any more alcohol, or 2) you were kicking him out of the bar...

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/white-house-wants-critics-to-stop-echoing-trump-s-rhetoric-flunking-self-awareness/ar-AA21VtKt?ocid=entnewsntp&pc=DCTS&cvid=69f12346033f40498f961b8e63b845d4&ei=59 Opinion piece. White House Wants Critics to Stop Echoing Trump's Rhetoric: Flunking Self...

Well then, the "problem" to me is that he violated ethical rules with his original extrajudicial statements disclosing alleged facts surrounding the investigation. Continuing to do so only compounds the problem IMO.

Potentially tainting the jury pool is one of the reasons prosecutors have special ethical rules. The one about extrajudicial statements in Oklahoma states as follows: except for statements that are necessary to inform the public of the nature and extent of the prosecutor's action and that...

In my opinion, Acting AG Todd Blanche SHOULDN'T be answering basic ballistics questions about WHCD shooting at this time. I'm a big fan of trying my cases in the courtroom rather than in the media. Trying them in the media like J. Edgar Boozer/Keystone Kash Patel and Pam Bondi have done in the...

Thank you for your insight. I agree with this contention. I just wanted to get "the wrong question" out there and see how it was responded to. Agreed. Particularly with your focus on being "voluntarily curtailed". I believe that even if it is just hyperbole, it is protected speech that the...

You absolutely "agree or disagree with this claim"? Good to know. Even better if I knew which it was....agree or disagree.

Question for the board....agree or disagree with this claim? "Those who label the president as a fascist, as a threat to democracy, and compare him to Hitler to score political points are fueling this kind of violence".

1. We disagree on "mainly". Very much so. I would say a more accurate and true statement would be "approximately equally" with MAGAstanis/Trump/"Loonie Rightist" whatever you want to call it. If you don't troll those who you respect as decent humans, and I HOPE you are referring to me as a...

I didn't use Trump as a moral equivalence to attempt to justify actions/thought/posts of others. That's a mischaracterization by you. I merely carried out your proposition in a syllogism to draw a conclusion and to see if you agreed with that conclusion. No tu quoque fallacy here. No ad...