CFP

D-1 athletic departments are for profit business masquerading as “public” and shielded by state law.
Wrong answer amigo, their funds are state funds and they have to follow open records and open meeting. That’s why the outhouse on the prairie almost didn’t get its metal for part of their rebuild because of a question on if the admin followed the competitive bidding act. It’s just a matter of if concerned citizens want to request or sue for the records.
 
Wrong answer amigo, their funds are state funds and they have to follow open records and open meeting. That’s why the outhouse on the prairie almost didn’t get its metal for part of their rebuild because of a question on if the admin followed the competitive bidding act. It’s just a matter of if concerned citizens want to request or sue for the records.

Yes, they have to follow open records laws, but don’t think they are playing by the same rules.

Who is going to call them on it? You think the state officials that sit in the luxury boxes and hobnob at games are going to blow the whistle?
 
ou and texas left early. Contracts mean nothing anymore. We are already hearing rumblings about the top tier schools in conference wanting a larger portion of revenue. It is coming and will probably be counter productive until it gets figured out.
Contracts can always be broken, but there is a price to pay, and often it's quite expensive to get out of. The big 12 stood to gain quite a lot of money by OU and texas leaving early. On top of moving two recruiting giants out of the conference, it was a good day for many big 12 teams.

If you believe contracts mean nothing, i would avoid signing one, but we both know that isnt happening.

Anyway, if top tier schools want a larger portion of revenue, they cant just take it, it's distributed by the conference. There would have to be an agreement, otherwise they have no way to obtain those distributions
 
Back
Top